Skip to content

Solve math problems written in braille math code

3-5Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For braille users doing grade-level math in Nemeth code or UEB technical, as the district uses. Present levels in reading math symbols and in computation decide fit.

Baseline
Give a short set of problems at the classroom level and score separately whether the setup is correct and whether the answer is correct. The split tells you whether the code or the math is the barrier.
Tips
Agree with the math teacher which skills count; the TVI checks the code and the teacher checks the math. Brailled worksheets must arrive the same day as print ones.
Limits
The template measures math in braille code, not math reasoning alone. An abacus or talking calculator may be used for computation by team decision.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ac-brl-021.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a brailled worksheet of multi-digit addition, subtraction, and multiplication problems in the district's math code, with a braillewriter, the student will read each problem, set it up in spatial form on the braillewriter, and solve it independently with at least 85% accuracy on math problems set up and solved, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 45% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Braille Literacy.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Vision, Hearing & Assistive Technology - Braille Literacy
Baseline
45% accuracy.
Annual goal439 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a brailled worksheet of multi-digit addition, subtraction, and multiplication problems in the district's math code, with a braillewriter, the student will read each problem, set it up in spatial form on the braillewriter, and solve it independently with at least 85% accuracy on math problems set up and solved, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a brailled worksheet of multi-digit addition, subtraction, and multiplication problems in the district's math code, with a braillewriter
Behavior
The student will read each problem, set it up in spatial form on the braillewriter, and solve it independently
Criteria
With at least 85% accuracy on math problems set up and solved, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.