Skip to content

Find the mean of repeated lab trials

9-12, 6-8Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For high school students who record several trials in a lab but report one trial, or add the trials and stop, so their results are not usable. Present levels in calculator addition and division decide fit.

Baseline
Use two lab tables at baseline. Record whether errors come from adding, dividing by the wrong count, rounding, or leaving off the unit. Four conditions per table makes four items; score each mean as one item.
Tips
Teach why scientists repeat trials before teaching the calculation. Spreadsheets with an average function are an honest tool for older students; name the tool in the condition.
Limits
Four items per lab is small, so the target is often all four. The goal does not cover spotting outliers or judging whether trials agree.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ca-sci-030.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a data table with 3 to 5 repeated measurements for each of 4 conditions and a calculator, the student will calculate the mean for each condition, round to the place the teacher gives, and write it in the results column with the unit independently with 100% accuracy on calculated means, on 3 of 4 consecutive labs, as measured by work-sample analysis collected at each lab with repeated trials.

Baseline: 25% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Science Skills.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Science, Social Studies & Digital Literacy - Science Skills
Baseline
25% accuracy.
Annual goal431 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a data table with 3 to 5 repeated measurements for each of 4 conditions and a calculator, the student will calculate the mean for each condition, round to the place the teacher gives, and write it in the results column with the unit independently with 100% accuracy on calculated means, on 3 of 4 consecutive labs, as measured by work-sample analysis collected at each lab with repeated trials.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a data table with 3 to 5 repeated measurements for each of 4 conditions and a calculator
Behavior
The student will calculate the mean for each condition, round to the place the teacher gives, and write it in the results column with the unit independently
Criteria
With 100% accuracy on calculated means, on 3 of 4 consecutive labs
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
At each lab with repeated trials

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.