Skip to content

Interpret a population or history line graph

6-8, 9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For middle school students who skip graphs in social studies texts or read one value without connecting the trend to the history. Present levels in reading line graphs in math decide fit.

Baseline
Write two questions at each level: read a value, describe a change, and connect the change to history. Score levels separately; the connection level is the target.
Tips
Pull graphs from the student's textbook so the probe reflects real reading. The math teacher can help keep graph vocabulary consistent.
Limits
Six questions is a short probe. The goal does not cover making graphs.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ca-ss-022.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a line graph from a social studies text (such as city population or immigration over time) and 6 questions, the student will answer each question with a value, a change over time, or a connection between the trend and an event from the unit independently with at least 83% accuracy on graph interpretation questions, on 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 33% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Social Studies Skills.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Science, Social Studies & Digital Literacy - Social Studies Skills
Baseline
33% accuracy.
Annual goal455 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a line graph from a social studies text (such as city population or immigration over time) and 6 questions, the student will answer each question with a value, a change over time, or a connection between the trend and an event from the unit independently with at least 83% accuracy on graph interpretation questions, on 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a line graph from a social studies text (such as city population or immigration over time) and 6 questions
Behavior
The student will answer each question with a value, a change over time, or a connection between the trend and an event from the unit independently
Criteria
With at least 83% accuracy on graph interpretation questions, on 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.