Skip to content

Mark the action words in directions first

6-8, 3-5, 9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who skim written directions and do part of what is asked (answer but do not explain, list but do not circle). Reading level should give access, with text-to-speech if needed. Present levels, not grade, decide the length of directions.

Baseline
List the actions in the directions on two or three assignments and score which ones the student did. Then teach marking and compare.
Tips
Score each action, not content correctness. Underlines on the page show strategy use. The student can keep the word list in a binder or notes app.
Limits
Does not measure accuracy of content. Some directions are unclear; check that the teacher's directions have clear actions.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ef-dir-035.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a worksheet, test, or assignment with written directions of two to four actions, the student will underline each action word in the directions (such as solve, explain, circle, list) and carry out every underlined action independently with at least 90% accuracy on direction actions carried out, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 50% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Following Multi-Step Directions.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Executive Function - Following Multi-Step Directions
Baseline
50% accuracy.
Annual goal422 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a worksheet, test, or assignment with written directions of two to four actions, the student will underline each action word in the directions (such as solve, explain, circle, list) and carry out every underlined action independently with at least 90% accuracy on direction actions carried out, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a worksheet, test, or assignment with written directions of two to four actions
Behavior
The student will underline each action word in the directions (such as solve, explain, circle, list) and carry out every underlined action independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on direction actions carried out, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.