Skip to content

Sort words into Latin root families

3-5, 6-8Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For upper-elementary students who are starting to meet words built on common Latin roots (port, rupt, struct, spect, dict) and who treat each one as a new word. The student should read most of the words already; present levels decide the roots.

Baseline
Include one or two look-alike distractors (report and support share a root; portion does not). Score root meanings separately so the team sees whether sorting or meaning is the gap.
Tips
Root families make a word wall that grows across the year. Teach one root per week with words the student will meet in class. Pairs with the core morphology template, which asks for whole-word meanings.
Limits
Sorting can be done by spelling alone; the root-meaning step checks meaning. Some words have drifted from their root meaning; avoid those at first.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID rd-voc-025.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 15 word cards built on 3 taught Latin roots and a sorting mat, the student will sort the words into families by shared root and write the root's meaning at the top of each family independently with at least 90% accuracy on words sorted into the correct root family, on 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 45% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Vocabulary.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Reading - Vocabulary
Baseline
45% accuracy.
Annual goal404 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 15 word cards built on 3 taught Latin roots and a sorting mat, the student will sort the words into families by shared root and write the root's meaning at the top of each family independently with at least 90% accuracy on words sorted into the correct root family, on 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 15 word cards built on 3 taught Latin roots and a sorting mat
Behavior
The student will sort the words into families by shared root and write the root's meaning at the top of each family independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on words sorted into the correct root family, on 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.