Skip to content

Write an agreement with a peer after a conflict

6-8, 3-5Rubric scoreTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who agree out loud to end a conflict but forget the details or later dispute what was said. Present levels and writing mode, not grade, decide fit.

Baseline
Score the next two real or practice agreements with the rubric. Note which parts are missing most often.
Tips
Both students sign if they wish. Keep a copy for the follow-up (see se-cr-038).
Limits
A written agreement does not guarantee change; check follow-through separately.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID se-cr-040.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Score on a rubric with defined criteria and score levels.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Rubric criteria

Each one becomes a scoring column on the data sheet.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, at the end of a mediation or problem-solving conversation with a peer, the student will write an agreement with the peer that names the problem, what each person will do, and when they will check back independently, earning a score of at least 6 out of 8 on a 4-part conflict agreement rubric scored 0 to 2 per part, on 3 of 4 consecutive agreements, as measured by work-sample analysis collected after each mediation or practice session.

Baseline: 2 out of 8 rubric points.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Rubric score fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives rubric score data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Conflict Resolution.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Social-Emotional & Communication - Conflict Resolution
Baseline
2 out of 8 rubric points.
Annual goal469 characters
By the annual IEP review date, at the end of a mediation or problem-solving conversation with a peer, the student will write an agreement with the peer that names the problem, what each person will do, and when they will check back independently, earning a score of at least 6 out of 8 on a 4-part conflict agreement rubric scored 0 to 2 per part, on 3 of 4 consecutive agreements, as measured by work-sample analysis collected after each mediation or practice session.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
At the end of a mediation or problem-solving conversation with a peer
Behavior
The student will write an agreement with the peer that names the problem, what each person will do, and when they will check back independently
Criteria
Earning a score of at least 6 out of 8 on a 4-part conflict agreement rubric scored 0 to 2 per part, on 3 of 4 consecutive agreements
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
After each mediation or practice session

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Rubric tracker. Scores each rubric criterion and totals them.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.