Skip to content

Lead into and explain a quotation

6-8, 9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who drop quotations into paragraphs with no introduction and no explanation, so the quote stands alone. Present levels should show the student can find a relevant quote; the target is the lead-in, the quote, and the explanation.

Baseline
In two or three paragraphs, mark every quotation and score it as complete when it has a lead-in, correct quotation marks, and an explanation. Note which part is missing; explanation is the most common.
Tips
The quote sandwich is easy to teach and to self-check. Model explanations that start with phrases like This shows. Use texts from class so students know the context.
Limits
Explanation quality takes judgment; agree on what counts. Paragraphs with only one quote give all-or-nothing scores. Quotation punctuation is scored with the structure.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID wr-par-039.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, when writing a body paragraph about a text read in class, the student will introduce each quotation with a lead-in that names the speaker or source, punctuate it correctly, and follow it with at least one sentence explaining how it supports the paragraph's point independently with at least 80% accuracy on quotations used, on 3 of 4 consecutive scored paragraphs, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 20% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Paragraph Organization.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Writing - Paragraph Organization
Baseline
20% accuracy.
Annual goal458 characters
By the annual IEP review date, when writing a body paragraph about a text read in class, the student will introduce each quotation with a lead-in that names the speaker or source, punctuate it correctly, and follow it with at least one sentence explaining how it supports the paragraph's point independently with at least 80% accuracy on quotations used, on 3 of 4 consecutive scored paragraphs, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
When writing a body paragraph about a text read in class
Behavior
The student will introduce each quotation with a lead-in that names the speaker or source, punctuate it correctly, and follow it with at least one sentence explaining how it supports the paragraph's point independently
Criteria
With at least 80% accuracy on quotations used, on 3 of 4 consecutive scored paragraphs
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.