Working memory strategies for students in the classroom
By the IEP Atlas editorial teamLast updated
Short answer
The working memory strategies that help most in class reduce how much a student must hold in mind at once. Give directions in short chunks, put steps and key facts on paper the student can see, teach a routine for using that tool, and check understanding without testing recall. Then count how often the student uses the tool each week.
Working memory is the mental space where a student holds information while using it, such as keeping a direction in mind while finding the page. It is one of the three core executive function skills described by the Harvard Center on the Developing Child.[1] When it is small, students lose directions halfway, forget the question while writing the answer, and drop the carried digit in math.
The most useful classroom approach is to change the task, not the student's memory. Put the information somewhere the student can see it, and teach them to look. This page walks through that process with a fictional 4th grader. For goal wording once the supports are in place, see working memory IEP goals. The cluster pillar on executive functioning IEP goals covers the other skills.
What you need before you start
- Two or three observed examples of lost information. Write down the exact direction or task and what the student did.
- The evaluation summary, if there is one. A school psychologist's report may describe working memory scores. Use it to confirm the pattern, not to set the goal.
- A list of the heaviest moments in the day. Multi-step directions, note-taking, mental math and copying are common ones.
- A way to count. An opportunity data sheet is enough.
What about working memory training programs
Families often ask about computer games that promise to train working memory. Students do get better at the trained game. The case that those gains carry over to reading, math or following directions in class is weak; a meta-analysis found short-term gains on tasks like the ones practiced, with no convincing transfer to skills such as word decoding or arithmetic.[2] Spend the time on supports and strategies the student uses during real work, where the payoff is direct. If a family is already using a program, there is no need to argue; just keep the classroom supports in place and keep counting.
Step by step
1. Find where information drops
Watch for one week and log each time the student loses information. Note the load: how many steps, how long the message, how much writing at once. A pattern usually shows up within 10 entries. Example: "Lost directions 7 times. Every one had 3 or more steps. Never lost a 2-step direction."
2. Cut the load at the source
Give directions in chunks of 1 or 2 steps. Pause after each chunk. Show and say at the same time: point to the page number on the board while you say it. Hand out a partly completed example so the student does not have to hold the format and the content at once. This helps the whole class and costs nothing.
3. Put the information outside the head
Write the steps on the board and leave them up. Give a step card for routines that repeat, such as the long division steps or the morning routine. Use guided notes during lectures so the student writes key words, not whole sentences. In math, allow scrap paper for partial answers. A visible list does the holding so the student's working memory can do the thinking.
4. Teach a routine for using the tool
A card on the desk does nothing if the student never looks at it. Model it: "I'm stuck. I check my card. Step 3 says regroup." Practice the routine 3 or 4 times in a calm moment. Then cue it with a short phrase ("Check your card") and fade the cue over 2 to 3 weeks.
5. Check understanding without testing memory
Ask the student to restate the direction or point to the first step. Don't ask "Do you understand?" because almost every student says yes. Restating takes 10 seconds and catches the problem before the student spends 15 minutes on the wrong task.
6. Count tool use and adjust
Each week, record 10 opportunities: did the student use the tool, and did they complete the task? If tool use is high and completion is low, the tool is wrong or the load is too high. If tool use is low, teach the routine again. Look at 6 to 8 weeks of data before calling it.[3]
Worked example from start to finish
Jonah is a fictional 4th grader. In September his teacher logs 12 times he loses a direction during math and science. All 12 have 3 or more steps. On a week of probes, he completes all steps of 3-step spoken directions on 2 of 10 opportunities. He finishes 2-step directions on 9 of 10.
Week 1 to 2: cut the load. The teacher splits directions into 2-step chunks and writes each set on the board. Jonah's completion of the full task rises to 6 of 10.
Week 3 to 4: external tool. Jonah gets a dry-erase strip on his desk. He copies the step numbers and key words as the teacher speaks. The teacher models the routine twice and cues "Strip first" before each direction. Completion reaches 7 of 10; strip use is 8 of 10.
Week 5 to 8: fade the cue. The cue drops to a tap on the desk, then nothing. By week 8 Jonah uses the strip on 9 of 10 directions without a cue and completes the task on 8 of 10.
| Week | Support | Used strip (of 10) | Completed all steps (of 10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | None | 0 | 2 |
| 2 | 2-step chunks on board | 0 | 6 |
| 4 | Strip with verbal cue | 8 | 7 |
| 6 | Strip with tap cue | 8 | 8 |
| 8 | Strip, no cue | 9 | 8 |
At the annual review, the team writes a goal around the strip routine: after a 3-step spoken direction, Jonah will write the key words on his desk strip and complete all steps in 8 of 10 opportunities. A matching template is the write down directions goal. The 2-step chunking stays in his accommodations.
Strategies by classroom moment
| Moment | Load-cutting support | Student strategy to teach |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-step directions | Chunks of 2, steps written on the board | Restate or jot key words |
| Lectures and note-taking | Guided notes, slides shared ahead | Fill blanks, star what to ask about |
| Mental math | Scrap paper, worked example on the desk | Write each partial answer |
| Copying from the board | Copy of the notes at the desk | Copy one line, check, then the next |
| Reading comprehension questions | Question visible while reading | Reread the question before answering |
| Remembering for later | Shared calendar, written reminders | Set an alarm or write a sticky note |
| Long tasks with interruptions | Visible checklist | Mark the stopping point |
Several of these have goal templates, such as using a reference card, filling in guided notes and rereading the question before answering.
Common mistakes
- Weak: Repeating the direction louder or slower. Better: Write it down and point to it. Repetition still relies on memory; a written step does not.
- Weak: Asking "Got it?" after a direction. Better: Ask the student to tell you the first step.
- Weak: Taking the step card away to see if the student "really knows it." Better: Treat independent use of the card as the skill. Adults use lists too.
- Weak: Giving a 5-step direction and a card. Better: Give 2 steps, wait, then give 2 more. Cut the load before adding tools.
- Weak: Adding six new supports in one week. Better: Add one, count for 2 weeks, then add the next. Otherwise you can't tell what worked.
Templates and tools
- The working memory goals page has templates for restating, note-taking, check-off lists and mental math.
- The opportunity data sheet records 10 chances a week; use one column for "used the tool" and one for "completed the task."
- If the trouble is mostly long directions, following directions IEP goals has goals by step count.
- Paste a draft goal into the goal checker before the meeting.
Frequently asked questions
What are good working memory strategies for students?
Chunk directions into 1 or 2 steps, leave the steps written where the student can see them, use guided notes, allow scrap paper in math, and ask the student to restate directions. Then teach the student a routine for checking the written support.
Can working memory be improved with practice?
Students improve on the specific tasks they practice. Gains from computer training games tend not to carry over to classwork, so classroom time is better spent on supports and strategies the student uses during real assignments.
Are working memory supports accommodations or goals?
The supports the teacher provides, such as chunked directions and copies of notes, are accommodations. Teaching the student to use a strategy on their own, and counting it, can become a goal. Most students need both.
Use it in IEP Atlas
- Working memory goals (executive function)
- Executive function IEP goals
- Opportunity data sheet
- IEP goal checker
Related guides
- Executive functioning IEP goals: examples by skill
- Working memory IEP goals: 12 examples that measure strategy use
- Following directions IEP goals: 20 sample goals by step count and type
- Task initiation IEP goals
- Test-taking IEP goals: 24 examples for strategies before, during and after tests
- Self-monitoring strategies that work in the classroom
Sources
- A Guide to Executive Function, Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University
- Is Working Memory Training Effective? A Meta-Analytic Review (Melby-Lervåg and Hulme, 2013), Developmental Psychology, via PubMed
- Progress Monitoring: Data & Goal Setting, National Center on Intensive Intervention
Written and checked by the IEP Atlas editorial team under our editorial policy. This guide describes general practice and federal rules. It is not legal advice; your state may add requirements, and the IEP team makes the decisions for each student.