Skip to content

Write a professional email with dictation

9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For older students who use speech-to-text and need to write emails to teachers, employers, and offices. Present levels in dictation and in email conventions decide fit.

Baseline
Collect three dictated emails and count sentences that read as intended. Note missing parts such as a subject line.
Tips
Use real emails when possible; the stakes help. Email tone can be taught alongside.
Limits
Dictation errors with names and terms need manual fixes. The AT specialist and team choose the tool from an AT assessment and trial data; the template measures what the student does with it, not the tool's quality.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ac-at-032.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a real reason to email (such as asking a teacher about a grade or replying to a job posting), with speech-to-text on their device, the student will dictate the email with a subject, greeting, clear message, and closing, then edit and send it independently with at least 90% accuracy on sentences free of dictation errors, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 50% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Assistive Technology Use.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Vision, Hearing & Assistive Technology - Assistive Technology Use
Baseline
50% accuracy.
Annual goal460 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a real reason to email (such as asking a teacher about a grade or replying to a job posting), with speech-to-text on their device, the student will dictate the email with a subject, greeting, clear message, and closing, then edit and send it independently with at least 90% accuracy on sentences free of dictation errors, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a real reason to email (such as asking a teacher about a grade or replying to a job posting), with speech-to-text on their device
Behavior
The student will dictate the email with a subject, greeting, clear message, and closing, then edit and send it independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on sentences free of dictation errors, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.