Skip to content

Assistive Technology Use IEP goals

Assistive technology goals teach students to use tools that give access to learning: text-to-speech for reading, speech-to-text and word prediction for writing, digital graphic organizers, scanning pens, and switch or eye-gaze access to a computer. Good goals name the tool, the task, and what the student does on their own, including choosing the right tool and setting it up. Measure tool use on assignments with opportunities or work completion, setup with a task analysis, and output quality with accuracy. Communication devices stay in AAC.

40 templates · How we write and review goals

Sample assistive technology use goals

Numbers are illustrative; set targets from the student's own baseline (how templates are made).

  • K-2, 3-5Task-analysis steps

    Open a digital book and start read-aloud

    Text-to-speech: opening a digital book

    By the annual IEP review date, during independent reading time, given a tablet with a digital library app and the student's login, the student will log in, find the assigned book, open it, and turn on read-aloud with word highlighting, performing at least 6 of 7 steps independently, on 4 of 5 observed days, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected twice weekly.

    Customize
  • K-2, 3-5Opportunities

    Press a switch to make something happen

    Switch access: cause and effect

    By the annual IEP review date, given a switch placed at the body site chosen by the OT, connected to a computer or tablet cause-and-effect activity, the student will press the switch to start the activity and press again when it stops independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected each session.

    Customize
  • K-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Dictate a journal sentence with voice typing

    Speech-to-text: early dictation

    By the annual IEP review date, during journal writing, given a tablet with voice typing turned on and a picture prompt, the student will press the microphone, say a sentence clearly in phrases, stop the microphone, and check the words on the screen independently with at least 85% accuracy on dictated words transcribed as intended, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly writing samples, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize
  • K-2Opportunities

    Choose words from a picture word bank

    Word banks and early word prediction

    By the annual IEP review date, during a writing task on a tablet or computer, with an on-screen picture word bank for the topic, the student will type the first letter or open the word bank and choose the word they want independently in at least 6 of 8 opportunities, on 4 of 5 observed days, as measured by direct observation collected twice weekly.

    Customize
  • K-2Task-analysis steps

    Log in and open an assigned learning app

    Logging in and opening apps

    By the annual IEP review date, at the start of a center or independent work time, given the student's school device and login card, the student will turn on the device, log in, open the assigned app, and get to the first activity, performing all 5 steps independently, on 4 of 5 observed days, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected twice weekly.

    Customize
  • K-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Select answers through a keyguard

    Touch screen with a keyguard

    By the annual IEP review date, given a tablet with a keyguard and touch accommodations set, during a learning app activity with 4 to 6 answer buttons, the student will touch the chosen answer button once through the keyguard independently with at least 90% accuracy on intended buttons selected, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.

    Customize
  • 3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Use text-to-speech to read grade-level text

    Text-to-speech for grade-level text

    By the annual IEP review date, given a grade-level science or social studies passage in a digital format with text-to-speech and 5 comprehension questions, the student will use text-to-speech to read the passage, rereading parts as needed, and answer the questions independently with at least 80% accuracy on comprehension questions, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize
  • 3-5, 6-8Task-analysis steps

    Set text-to-speech speed, voice, and highlighting

    Text-to-speech setup

    By the annual IEP review date, at the start of a reading assignment on the school device with the text-to-speech toolbar, the student will open the text-to-speech settings and set the voice, speed, and highlighting they prefer, then test on a line of text, performing all 6 steps independently, on 3 consecutive setups, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected weekly.

    Customize
  • 3-5, 6-8Work completion

    Complete writing assignments with speech-to-text

    Speech-to-text for assignments

    By the annual IEP review date, during class writing assignments, given a device with speech-to-text and a quiet spot or headset microphone, the student will draft the assignment with speech-to-text, read or listen back, fix errors, and turn it in independently, completing at least 85% of assigned writing assignments, across 4 consecutive weeks, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize
  • 3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Fix dictation errors with voice commands

    Editing dictated text

    By the annual IEP review date, given a dictated paragraph of their own with recognition and punctuation errors, the student will listen back or reread the draft and fix each error with voice commands or the keyboard independently with at least 80% accuracy on dictation errors corrected, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize
  • 3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Write sentences with word prediction

    Word prediction

    By the annual IEP review date, during a typed writing task, given word prediction with speech on the word list, the student will type the first letters of each hard word, listen to or read the prediction list, and choose the right word independently with at least 90% accuracy on words spelled correctly in the final draft, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly writing samples, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize
  • 3-5, 6-8Work completion

    Plan writing in a digital graphic organizer

    Digital graphic organizers

    By the annual IEP review date, during the planning stage of a writing assignment, given a digital graphic organizer template, the student will fill in the digital organizer with a main idea and supporting details and move it into a draft independently, completing at least 85% of assigned planning organizers, across 4 consecutive weeks, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize

28 more assistive technology use templates

Each opens in the builder with its sample goal, notes, objectives, and data sheet.

What assistive technology use involves

  • Using text-to-speech to read assignments
  • Using speech-to-text and word prediction to write
  • Using digital graphic organizers and scanning pens or OCR apps
  • Using switch access or eye-gaze access to a computer
  • Choosing the right tool for a task and setting it up without help
  • Requesting AT in a new class or setting

Baseline and measurement considerations

  • Start with the AT evaluation or trial data to see which tools help and how much.
  • Score setup as a task analysis: open the tool, adjust settings, start the task, save.
  • Count opportunities for tool use, such as each reading or writing assignment where the tool would help.
  • Use work completion or accuracy to show the effect, such as percent of assigned writing completed with speech-to-text.
  • Teachers collect data in class; the AT specialist or OT checks setup and access methods, and logs note days the tool was unavailable.

Progress-monitoring methods used in these templates

  • Task-analysis checklist: A routine is broken into ordered steps; each step is recorded as independent, supported, or not completed.
  • Opportunity (trial) recording: Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Work-sample analysis: Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.
  • Direct observation: An adult observes and records the defined behavior during a specified activity.
  • Frequency (event) recording: Each occurrence of a clearly defined behavior is tallied during a fixed observation period.
  • Rubric scoring: Work or performance is scored against written criteria with defined score levels.

How each measure works

Matching data sheets

Each template links to a blank sheet built for its measure. You can also download these sheets on their own:

  • Task-analysis checklist: Marks each step of a routine as independent, with support, or not completed across sessions.
  • Opportunity tracker: Records each opportunity as independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Accuracy tracker: Number correct out of number attempted, with percent accuracy and support level.
  • Rubric tracker: Scores each rubric criterion and totals the score for each sample.

Common mistakes when writing assistive technology use goals

  • Writing "will use AT" without naming the tool or task.
  • Putting the tool in the accommodations page and never teaching the student to use it.
  • Putting communication device goals here; those belong in AAC.
  • Measuring the tool instead of the student: what the student does with it is the goal.
  • Not logging days the device was missing or uncharged, which skews the data.

Frequently asked questions

How do I write an IEP goal for assistive technology?

Name the tool, the task, and the student's part. For example: given a writing assignment, the student will open speech-to-text, dictate a draft, and edit it for errors, completing at least 80% of assigned writing tasks with the tool. Base the tool choice on AT trial data.

Does the IEP team have to consider assistive technology?

Yes. Under 34 CFR 300.324(a)(2)(v), the team must consider whether the student needs assistive technology devices and services. The decision and any tools go in the IEP.

What is a good AT goal for high school?

Choosing the right tool for a task and setting it up without help fits older students, who will need these skills in college and work. Requesting AT in a new class or job setting is another strong goal.

How often should I collect data on AT goals?

Several times a week during real assignments. Setup routines can be scored weekly until they are steady.

References

IEP Atlas Pro

Turn these goals into progress reports

Pro tracks every goal on your caseload and drafts the report for you. Free for 14 days.

Count trials, prompts, and minutes live in the session; the graph and trend line draw themselves; progress reports are drafted from your data.