Skip to content

Find complements to 100 and 1,000

3-5, 6-8Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who know make-10 pairs but cannot quickly find what goes with 65 to make 100 or 350 to make 1,000, which they need for counting up and making change. Present levels in make-10 pairs and counting by tens decide readiness.

Baseline
The common error is making each digit add to 10 (65 and 45). Record it separately; it shows the student is not making the next ten first.
Tips
Money ties this to real life: from 65 cents, how much to make a dollar? Use with the counting-up strategy for subtraction.
Limits
Covers one kind of missing-addend item. Does not measure general multi-digit subtraction.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-as-043.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 20 numbers from 1 to 99 and the question "how many more to make 100?", the student will write the missing amount for each number independently with at least 90% accuracy on complement problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 30% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Addition & Subtraction.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Math - Addition & Subtraction
Baseline
30% accuracy.
Annual goal321 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 20 numbers from 1 to 99 and the question "how many more to make 100?", the student will write the missing amount for each number independently with at least 90% accuracy on complement problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 20 numbers from 1 to 99 and the question "how many more to make 100?"
Behavior
The student will write the missing amount for each number independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on complement problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.