Skip to content

Tell apart look-alike numerals

K-2Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who mix up numerals that look alike (6 and 9, 2 and 5, 1 and 7) or reverse teen numbers (12 and 21). Present levels in numeral naming, not grade, decide fit.

Baseline
Give the full set and record which pairs are confused. Reversals in writing are common in young students; this goal targets naming and spotting them, not writing.
Tips
Teach a feature for each pair (6 has a belly at the bottom, 9 at the top). Use the second condition for students who are starting to self-check their own writing.
Limits
Handwriting reversals in writing may persist even when naming is accurate. The goal does not measure numeral writing.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-en-014.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 20 numeral cards that mix commonly confused pairs, the student will name each numeral correctly independently with at least 90% accuracy on look-alike numerals, across 3 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

Baseline: 50% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Early Numeracy & Counting.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Math - Early Numeracy & Counting
Baseline
50% accuracy.
Annual goal299 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 20 numeral cards that mix commonly confused pairs, the student will name each numeral correctly independently with at least 90% accuracy on look-alike numerals, across 3 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 20 numeral cards that mix commonly confused pairs
Behavior
The student will name each numeral correctly independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on look-alike numerals, across 3 consecutive sessions
Evaluation method
Opportunity-by-opportunity data
Schedule
Twice weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.