Skip to content

Compare unit fractions and explain the size

3-5Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who think 1/8 is bigger than 1/4 because 8 is bigger than 4. Present levels in naming fractions from models decide readiness.

Baseline
Record the bigger-denominator-is-bigger error. A baseline near 50% with that error pattern shows the student is reversing every pair.
Tips
Use the same whole for both fractions in any drawing. This is the base for comparing all fractions (ma-fr-003).
Limits
Covers unit fractions only. Non-unit fractions need other strategies.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-fr-022.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 10 pairs of unit fractions with denominators from 2 to 12, the student will circle the larger fraction in each pair and give a reason based on the size of the parts independently with at least 90% accuracy on unit fraction comparisons, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 30% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Fractions.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Math - Fractions
Baseline
30% accuracy.
Annual goal363 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 pairs of unit fractions with denominators from 2 to 12, the student will circle the larger fraction in each pair and give a reason based on the size of the parts independently with at least 90% accuracy on unit fraction comparisons, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 10 pairs of unit fractions with denominators from 2 to 12
Behavior
The student will circle the larger fraction in each pair and give a reason based on the size of the parts independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on unit fraction comparisons, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.