Find totals and differences with money amounts
When to use this goal
For students who need to total a short shopping list or find how much more an item costs, with or without a calculator. Present levels in decimal addition and in money notation decide whether a calculator is written in.
- Baseline
- Note whether errors come from decimal alignment, dropped cents on whole-dollar amounts, or calculator entry (missing the decimal point). Items with a whole-dollar price mixed with cents (for example, $3 and $1.25) are the usual failure.
- Tips
- Menus and flyers from places the student goes make this real. Pair with the enough-money decision in the problem-solving skill when the purpose is shopping.
- Limits
- Totals on paper do not show that the student can keep a running total in a store. Tax is not included unless written into the condition.
Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-mtm-018.
Sign in to add this goal to a student.
Goal
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 problems that total 2 to 4 priced items or find the difference between two prices, with a calculator, the student will write the total or difference with a dollar sign and two cent digits independently with at least 85% accuracy on money problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Baseline: 40% accuracy.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check11 of 11 met
Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.
Met: Condition. Stated.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.
Met: Review timeframe. Stated.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Measurement, Time & Money.
Met: Level of support. Defined.
Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.
Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.
Paste into your IEP system
Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.
- Area of need
- Math - Measurement, Time & Money
- Baseline
- 40% accuracy.
- Annual goal371 characters
- By the annual IEP review date, given 10 problems that total 2 to 4 priced items or find the difference between two prices, with a calculator, the student will write the total or difference with a dollar sign and two cent digits independently with at least 85% accuracy on money problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
- Timeframe
- By the annual IEP review date
- Condition
- Given 10 problems that total 2 to 4 priced items or find the difference between two prices, with a calculator
- Behavior
- The student will write the total or difference with a dollar sign and two cent digits independently
- Criteria
- With at least 85% accuracy on money problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes
- Evaluation method
- Work-sample analysis
- Schedule
- Weekly
Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.
Matching data sheet
Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.
Accuracy tracker
Percent accuracy- Student label:
- Target:
- with at least 85% accuracy on money problems
- Mastery rule:
- on 3 of 4 consecutive probes
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Work-sample analysis
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, given 10 problems that total 2 to 4 priced items or find the difference between two prices, with a calculator, the student will write the total or difference with a dollar sign and two cent digits independently with at least 85% accuracy on money problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
| Date | Task / materials | # correct | # attempted | % accuracycorrect ÷ attempted × 100 | Support levele.g., independent, 1 verbal prompt | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Score only items the student attempted unless the goal defines a fixed set of items. Use the same denominator every session.
- Percent = numerator ÷ denominator × 100. Round to one decimal place.
- Record the support actually provided, even if the goal is independent performance.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.