Skip to content

Order three or more objects by length

K-2, PKOpportunitiesTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who can compare two objects but cannot put three or more in order from shortest to longest. Present levels in comparing two objects decide readiness.

Baseline
Record whether the student lines up the ends; not lining them up is the most common error.
Tips
Real classroom objects work best. Add weight and capacity ordering as later objectives.
Limits
Measures ordering, not measuring with units.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-mtm-031.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Number of opportunities in which the behavior is demonstrated, out of a fixed number.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 3 to 5 objects such as straws, ribbons or pencils of clearly different lengths, the student will line up the objects with their ends even and order them from shortest to longest independently in at least 5 of 6 trials, on 3 of 4 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.

Baseline: 1 of 6 opportunities.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives opportunities data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Measurement, Time & Money.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Math - Measurement, Time & Money
Baseline
1 of 6 opportunities.
Annual goal352 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 3 to 5 objects such as straws, ribbons or pencils of clearly different lengths, the student will line up the objects with their ends even and order them from shortest to longest independently in at least 5 of 6 trials, on 3 of 4 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 3 to 5 objects such as straws, ribbons or pencils of clearly different lengths
Behavior
The student will line up the objects with their ends even and order them from shortest to longest independently
Criteria
In at least 5 of 6 trials, on 3 of 4 consecutive sessions
Evaluation method
Opportunity-by-opportunity data
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Opportunity tracker. One box per opportunity in each session.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.