Skip to content

Solve problems involving rate, distance and time

9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

Fits high school students who need applied problem solving for driving, travel, work and science, and who cannot set up a rate problem even with a formula. Present levels in proportions and in evaluating formulas decide readiness.

Baseline
Vary which quantity is unknown; finding time (distance divided by rate) is usually the weakest. Include a unit mismatch (minutes versus hours) in one or two items to see whether the student notices.
Tips
Use situations the student will meet (hours to earn a target amount, time to drive to a job). Pairs with the vocational and transition goals in functional skills.
Limits
Does not cover unit conversion in depth; see the measurement skill for that. Calculator use is assumed, so the goal measures setup and interpretation.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-ps-014.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 10 word problems involving speed, distance and time, or hourly pay and hours worked, with a calculator, the student will write the formula or proportion, substitute the known values, and write the labeled answer independently with at least 80% accuracy on rate problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 25% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Math Problem Solving.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Math - Math Problem Solving
Baseline
25% accuracy.
Annual goal400 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 word problems involving speed, distance and time, or hourly pay and hours worked, with a calculator, the student will write the formula or proportion, substitute the known values, and write the labeled answer independently with at least 80% accuracy on rate problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 10 word problems involving speed, distance and time, or hourly pay and hours worked, with a calculator
Behavior
The student will write the formula or proportion, substitute the known values, and write the labeled answer independently
Criteria
With at least 80% accuracy on rate problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.