Skip to content
IEP Atlas
Menu

Math Problem Solving IEP goals

Problem-solving goals focus on setting up and checking problems, not only on computing. Students may compute accurately yet choose the wrong operation, skip steps, or accept unreasonable answers, and each of those calls for a different measure. Separate reading demands from math by reading problems aloud when decoding is not the target.

6 templates · Not yet educator-reviewed · How we write and review goals

Sample math problem solving goals

Numbers are illustrative. Set targets from the student's own baseline data.

  • Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Solve one-step addition and subtraction word problems

    One-step addition and subtraction word problems

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 one-step addition and subtraction word problems within 100, including compare and start-unknown problems, with text read aloud on request, the student will write an equation and the answer for each problem independently with at least 80% accuracy on one-step word problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize this goalAccuracy tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Task-analysis steps

    Follow a problem-solving routine for word problems

    Problem-solving routine

    By the annual IEP review date, given a one- or two-step word problem during independent math work, the student will complete the steps of the taught problem-solving routine without a cue card, performing at least 8 of 9 steps independently, on 3 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected weekly.

    Customize this goalTask-analysis checklist
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Rubric score

    Solve multi-step word problems with a complete written solution

    Multi-step word problems

    By the annual IEP review date, given a two-step word problem that requires two different operations, the student will write a complete solution that shows a plan, the work for each step, and a labeled answer independently, earning a score of at least 9 out of 12 on a 4-row multi-step problem rubric (0–3 points per row), on 3 of 4 consecutive scored samples, as measured by a defined scoring rubric collected every two weeks.

    Customize this goalRubric tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Identify the problem type and operation before solving

    Identifying problem type and operation

    By the annual IEP review date, when given a one-step word problem, before solving it, the student will name the problem type (total, difference, change, equal groups, or comparison) and the operation to use independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Find totals and determine if there is enough money

    Money problems with a calculator

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 shopping scenarios with 2 to 4 priced items and a set amount of money, the student will use a calculator to find the total cost and state whether there is enough money independently with at least 80% accuracy on shopping scenarios, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize this goalAccuracy tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Estimate before solving and check reasonableness

    Estimating and checking reasonableness

    By the annual IEP review date, when solving a multi-digit word problem during independent math work, the student will write an estimate before solving and compare the final answer to the estimate independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker

Math · Math Problem Solving

Customize a goal

Student reference

Use a generic label rather than a student's name. Review goals within your school's approved IEP system.

Current baseline

Sample numbers are illustrative. Set the baseline and target from the student's own assessment data and team judgment.

Condition

Setting, materials, or situation, such as a passage level or a work period.

Observable behavior

Something an adult can see, count, or time. Avoid “understand,” “improve,” or “know.”

Level of support

Say exactly what support counts, such as “with one verbal prompt.” Leave “independently” if none.

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Measurement method

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

Mastery rule
Timeframe and monitoring

You can type a date, such as “By May 15, 2027”.

Match the schedule to the skill. Fluency often uses weekly probes. Writing rubrics may be scored every few weeks.

Live goal preview

By the annual IEP review date, given 10 one-step addition and subtraction word problems within 100, including compare and start-unknown problems, with text read aloud on request, the student will write an equation and the answer for each problem independently with at least 80% accuracy on one-step word problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 40% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method
Add objectivesMatching data sheet

Measurability check10 of 10 met

All structural checks are met.

  • Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis can produce percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Math Problem Solving.

  • Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.

What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.

Build objectives by

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Your goal is scored as percent correct, so the sheet records number correct and number attempted.

Accuracy tracker

Percent accuracy
Student label:
 
Target:
with at least 80% accuracy on one-step word problems
Mastery rule:
on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Collection schedule:
weekly
Method:
Work-sample analysis
Data collector:
 

Goal: By the annual IEP review date, given 10 one-step addition and subtraction word problems within 100, including compare and start-unknown problems, with text read aloud on request, the student will write an equation and the answer for each problem independently with at least 80% accuracy on one-step word problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Accuracy tracker
DateTask / materials# correct# attempted% accuracycorrect ÷ attempted × 100Support levele.g., independent, 1 verbal promptNotes

Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.

  • Score only items the student attempted unless the goal defines a fixed set of items. Use the same denominator every session.
  • Percent = numerator ÷ denominator × 100. Round to one decimal place.
  • Record the support actually provided, even if the goal is independent performance.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.

Prefer more room? Open this template in the full builder.

skill_page

What math problem solving involves

  • Identifying the question and the information needed
  • Recognizing problem types and choosing the operation
  • Representing problems with diagrams and equations
  • Solving multi-step problems with labeled answers
  • Estimating and checking whether answers are reasonable
  • Applying math to everyday tasks such as purchases

Baseline and measurement considerations

  • One-step problems can be scored for accuracy on a fixed set; state whether the equation must also be correct.
  • Multi-step solutions are better captured with a rubric that scores planning, computation, and the labeled answer.
  • A task-analysis checklist suits goals about following a taught routine.
  • Vary problem language so key words do not give away the operation.

Progress-monitoring methods used in these templates

  • Work-sample analysis: Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.
  • Task-analysis checklist: A routine is broken into ordered steps; each step is recorded as independent, supported, or not completed.
  • Rubric scoring: Work or performance is scored against written criteria with defined score levels.
  • Opportunity (trial) recording: Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Matching data sheets

Each template links to a blank sheet built for its measure. You can also download these sheets on their own:

  • Accuracy tracker: Number correct out of number attempted, with percent accuracy and support level.
  • Task-analysis checklist: Marks each step of a routine as independent, with support, or not completed across sessions.
  • Rubric tracker: Scores each rubric criterion and totals the score for each sample.
  • Opportunity tracker: Records each opportunity as independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Common mistakes when writing math problem solving goals

  • Writing a computation goal and calling it problem solving.
  • Not separating reading difficulty from math reasoning, which makes results hard to interpret.
  • Teaching key words as rules, which fails on many problem structures.
  • Using a rubric without anchor examples, so scores drift between adults.

Frequently asked questions

Should word problems be read aloud?

If the goal is about math reasoning and reading is a separate need, yes. State the read-aloud in the condition so the data reflect math, not decoding.

Is a rubric or percent accuracy better for word problems?

Percent accuracy works for one-step problems with a clear right answer. For multi-step problems where the process matters, a rubric shows partial progress that right/wrong scoring hides.

How do I write a functional math goal for older students?

Choose tasks the student meets in daily life, such as checking whether there is enough money for a purchase, and decide with the team whether a calculator is the tool. Check performance in the real setting too, not only on worksheets.

Do I need short-term objectives for a math goal?

Federal rules require benchmarks or short-term objectives for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Some states and districts require them for more students, so check local policy. Where they are used, a skill progression (for example, easier number ranges first) is a practical way to write them.

References

IEP Atlas is a drafting aid. Every goal is a starting point that needs to be individualized from assessment data and reviewed by the IEP team. It does not determine compliance or appropriateness for any student.