Skip to content

Decide whether a situation needs an estimate or an exact answer

3-5, 6-8, 9-12OpportunitiesTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who compute exact answers to the cent when a quick estimate would do, or who estimate when a bill must be exact. Present levels in rounding and estimation decide readiness.

Baseline
Because the decision is two-choice, chance is 50%; require a reason for credit so guessing does not count. Agree on the answer key as a team, since some situations are debatable, and keep only clear cases in the probe.
Tips
Pairs with the estimation and reasonableness templates. In community settings, the enough-money decision is the most frequent real use.
Limits
Judgment items depend on the scenarios chosen; two adults should agree on the key before data collection. Does not measure the quality of the estimate itself.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-ps-016.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Number of opportunities in which the behavior is demonstrated, out of a fixed number.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short situations such as checking whether there is enough money, splitting a bill, or timing a trip, the student will state whether an estimate or an exact answer is needed and give one reason independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.

Baseline: 4 of 10 opportunities.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives opportunities data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Math Problem Solving.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Math - Math Problem Solving
Baseline
4 of 10 opportunities.
Annual goal393 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short situations such as checking whether there is enough money, splitting a bill, or timing a trip, the student will state whether an estimate or an exact answer is needed and give one reason independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 10 short situations such as checking whether there is enough money, splitting a bill, or timing a trip
Behavior
The student will state whether an estimate or an exact answer is needed and give one reason independently
Criteria
In at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection sessions
Evaluation method
Opportunity-by-opportunity data
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Opportunity tracker. One box per opportunity in each session.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.