Skip to content

Find a unit rate and use it to compare or solve

6-8, 9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who cannot tell which of two sizes is the better buy or how far a car goes on one gallon, which are ratio problems in everyday clothing. Present levels in division with decimals or calculator use decide the support.

Baseline
The main error is dividing in the wrong order (units divided by price). Score the setup and the comparison separately, and include a pair where the bigger package is not the better buy.
Tips
Store shelf tags showing unit prices make a good real-world check. Rounding to the nearest cent is a needed subskill; state the rounding rule on the data sheet.
Limits
Does not cover proportions with a missing value, which is a fractions template. Calculator use is assumed; the goal measures setup and interpretation.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ma-ps-019.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 10 problems that give a total and a number of units and ask for the unit rate, such as price per item or miles per gallon, with a calculator, the student will divide to find the unit rate and write it with its label independently with at least 85% accuracy on unit rate problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 30% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Math Problem Solving.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Math - Math Problem Solving
Baseline
30% accuracy.
Annual goal409 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 problems that give a total and a number of units and ask for the unit rate, such as price per item or miles per gallon, with a calculator, the student will divide to find the unit rate and write it with its label independently with at least 85% accuracy on unit rate problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 10 problems that give a total and a number of units and ask for the unit rate, such as price per item or miles per gallon, with a calculator
Behavior
The student will divide to find the unit rate and write it with its label independently
Criteria
With at least 85% accuracy on unit rate problems, on 3 of 4 consecutive probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.