Skip to content
IEP Atlas
Menu

Self-Monitoring IEP goals

Self-monitoring goals teach students to observe and record their own behavior or work and compare it to a standard. Accuracy matters more than a positive rating, so many goals compare the student's record with an adult's. Over time, support fades from adult cues to timers to the student's own schedule.

5 templates · Not yet educator-reviewed · How we write and review goals

Sample self-monitoring goals

Numbers are illustrative. Set targets from the student's own baseline data.

  • Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Self-rate on-task behavior in agreement with the teacher

    Accurate self-rating of on-task behavior

    By the annual IEP review date, during a 20-minute independent work period with an interval cue every 2 to 5 minutes, the student will record a yes or no self-rating of on-task behavior at each cue that matches the teacher's rating independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, in 4 of 5 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected three times per week.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Check work with a self-check checklist and fix errors

    Checking work for errors

    By the annual IEP review date, after finishing an independent written assignment and before turning it in, the student will mark each item on a self-check checklist and correct the errors it identifies independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Task-analysis steps

    Record and graph personal progress data

    Self-graphing progress data

    By the annual IEP review date, after each progress-monitoring probe, the student will record and graph personal progress data using a student-friendly graph, performing at least 6 of 7 steps independently, across 4 consecutive data entries, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected weekly.

    Customize this goalTask-analysis checklist
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Rubric score

    Complete a daily self-evaluation on personal goals

    Daily self-evaluation

    By the annual IEP review date, at the end of each school day during a check-out meeting, the student will complete a written self-evaluation that rates performance on each personal goal and gives an example independently, earning a score of at least 6 out of 8 on a 4-row self-evaluation rubric scored 0 to 2 per row, on 4 of 5 consecutive school days, as measured by a defined scoring rubric collected daily and summarized weekly.

    Customize this goalRubric tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Complete self-monitoring checks without an adult cue

    Self-cued monitoring checks

    By the annual IEP review date, during independent work periods with scheduled self-monitoring checkpoints, the student will mark the self-monitoring card at each scheduled checkpoint without an adult cue using the classroom clock and checkpoint times written on the card in at least 5 of 6 opportunities, in 4 of 5 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker

Executive Function · Self-Monitoring

Customize a goal

Student reference

Use a generic label rather than a student's name. Review goals within your school's approved IEP system.

Current baseline

Sample numbers are illustrative. Set the baseline and target from the student's own assessment data and team judgment.

Condition

Setting, materials, or situation, such as a passage level or a work period.

Observable behavior

Something an adult can see, count, or time. Avoid “understand,” “improve,” or “know.”

Level of support

Say exactly what support counts, such as “with one verbal prompt.” Leave “independently” if none.

Criterion

Number of opportunities in which the behavior is demonstrated, out of a fixed number.

Measurement method

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Mastery rule
Timeframe and monitoring

You can type a date, such as “By May 15, 2027”.

Match the schedule to the skill. Fluency often uses weekly probes. Writing rubrics may be scored every few weeks.

Live goal preview

By the annual IEP review date, during a 20-minute independent work period with an interval cue every 2 to 5 minutes, the student will record a yes or no self-rating of on-task behavior at each cue that matches the teacher's rating independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, in 4 of 5 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected three times per week.

Baseline: 4 of 10 opportunities.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method
Add objectivesMatching data sheet

Measurability check10 of 10 met

All structural checks are met.

  • Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording can produce opportunities data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Self-Monitoring.

  • Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.

What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.

Build objectives by

Matching data sheet

Opportunity tracker. Your goal counts opportunities, so the sheet has one box per opportunity in each session.

Opportunity tracker

Opportunities
Student label:
 
Target:
in at least 8 of 10 opportunities
Mastery rule:
in 4 of 5 consecutive sessions
Collection schedule:
three times per week
Method:
Opportunity (trial) recording
Data collector:
 

Goal: By the annual IEP review date, during a 20-minute independent work period with an interval cue every 2 to 5 minutes, the student will record a yes or no self-rating of on-task behavior at each cue that matches the teacher's rating independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, in 4 of 5 consecutive sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected three times per week.

Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred

Opportunity tracker
DateActivity / context12345678910# + (of 10)Notes

Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.

  • Record up to 10 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
  • Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
  • Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.

Prefer more room? Open this template in the full builder.

skill_page

What self-monitoring involves

  • Recognizing the target behavior from a clear definition
  • Recording behavior at set times or after a task
  • Comparing ratings or work to a standard
  • Checking work for frequent error types before turning it in
  • Using data to choose a next step

Baseline and measurement considerations

  • Measure agreement between student and adult ratings, not the number of positive self-ratings.
  • Adults should rate independently before seeing the student's ratings.
  • Task-analysis checklists suit routines such as self-graphing.
  • Track the behavior being monitored separately; accurate monitoring does not guarantee change.

Progress-monitoring methods used in these templates

  • Opportunity (trial) recording: Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Task-analysis checklist: A routine is broken into ordered steps; each step is recorded as independent, supported, or not completed.
  • Rubric scoring: Work or performance is scored against written criteria with defined score levels.

Matching data sheets

Each template links to a blank sheet built for its measure. You can also download these sheets on their own:

  • Opportunity tracker: Records each opportunity as independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Task-analysis checklist: Marks each step of a routine as independent, with support, or not completed across sessions.
  • Rubric tracker: Scores each rubric criterion and totals the score for each sample.

Common mistakes when writing self-monitoring goals

  • Writing "will self-monitor" without saying what is monitored or how accuracy is checked.
  • Rewarding high self-ratings rather than accurate ones.
  • Never fading adult cues.
  • Using checklists with generic items instead of the student's actual error patterns.

Frequently asked questions

How accurate does self-monitoring need to be?

Teams often look for close agreement with adult ratings across several sessions before fading adult checks. Set the target from baseline agreement rather than a fixed rule.

Should the student see the adult's rating?

Yes, after both are recorded. Comparing ratings and discussing differences is how accuracy improves.

Can self-monitoring be used with younger students?

Yes, with picture cards, simple yes or no ratings, and short intervals. Keep the definition concrete and practice with examples and non-examples.

References

IEP Atlas is a drafting aid. Every goal is a starting point that needs to be individualized from assessment data and reviewed by the IEP team. It does not determine compliance or appropriateness for any student.