Skip to content
IEP Atlas
Menu

Planning IEP goals

Planning goals help students turn a large or multi-step task into a sequence of manageable actions with realistic timing. Younger students often start with saying a simple first-next-last plan; older students plan projects, weeks, and test preparation. Strong goals measure the plan with a checklist or rubric and, separately, whether the student follows it.

5 templates · Not yet educator-reviewed · How we write and review goals

Sample planning goals

Numbers are illustrative. Set targets from the student's own baseline data.

  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Task-analysis steps

    Break a long-term assignment into dated steps

    Breaking down a long-term assignment

    By the annual IEP review date, when given a long-term assignment due in 1 to 3 weeks, the student will create a written plan for the assignment using a project planning template, performing at least 6 of 7 steps independently, on 3 consecutive long-term assignments, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected for each long-term assignment.

  • Unreviewed draft6-8Rubric score

    Write a weekly plan that schedules work sessions

    Weekly planning

    By the annual IEP review date, during a weekly planning session at the start of each week, the student will write a weekly plan that schedules work sessions for upcoming assignments and tests independently, earning a score of at least 9 out of 12 on a 4-row weekly plan rubric scored 0 to 3 per row, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly plans, as measured by a defined scoring rubric collected weekly.

  • Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5Opportunities

    State a first-next-last plan before a multi-step task

    Stating a first-next-last plan

    By the annual IEP review date, before beginning a multi-step classroom task such as an art project or science activity, the student will state or draw a plan with a first, next, and last step independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.

  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Complete planned subtasks by their interim dates

    Following through on interim deadlines

    By the annual IEP review date, when working on a long-term assignment with a written plan that lists interim due dates, the student will complete each planned task by its interim date independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 2 consecutive long-term assignments, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected at each checkpoint.

  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Task-analysis steps

    Create a written study plan for an upcoming test

    Planning for a test

    By the annual IEP review date, when a unit test or quiz is announced at least 3 school days in advance, the student will create a written study plan for the upcoming test using a study-plan template, performing at least 5 of 6 steps independently, for 3 consecutive announced tests, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected for each announced test.

Executive Function · Planning

Customize a goal

Student reference

Use a generic label rather than a student's name. Review goals within your school's approved IEP system.

Current baseline

Sample numbers are illustrative. Set the baseline and target from the student's own assessment data and team judgment.

Condition

Setting, materials, or situation, such as a passage level or a work period.

Observable behavior

Something an adult can see, count, or time. Avoid “understand,” “improve,” or “know.”

Level of support

Say exactly what support counts, such as “with one verbal prompt.” Leave “independently” if none.

Criterion

Number of routine steps performed independently.

Task-analysis steps

Write each step so an observer can mark it done or not done.

Measurement method

A routine is broken into ordered steps; each step is recorded as independent, supported, or not completed.

Mastery rule
Timeframe and monitoring

You can type a date, such as “By May 15, 2027”.

Match the schedule to the skill. Fluency often uses weekly probes. Writing rubrics may be scored every few weeks.

Live goal preview

By the annual IEP review date, when given a long-term assignment due in 1 to 3 weeks, the student will create a written plan for the assignment using a project planning template, performing at least 6 of 7 steps independently, on 3 consecutive long-term assignments, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected for each long-term assignment.

Baseline: 2 of 7 steps independently.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

Measurability check10 of 10 met

All structural checks are met.

  • Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Task-analysis steps is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Task-analysis checklist can produce task-analysis steps data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Planning.

  • Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.

What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.

Build objectives by

Matching data sheet

Task-analysis checklist. Your goal counts steps done independently, so the sheet marks each step in each session.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.

Prefer more room? Open this template in the full builder.

skill_page

What planning involves

  • Identifying the parts of a larger task
  • Putting steps in a workable order
  • Assigning time or dates to each step
  • Identifying needed materials and resources
  • Following through on interim deadlines

Baseline and measurement considerations

  • Task-analysis checklists capture whether each planning step is present; rubrics capture plan quality.
  • Accept any reasonable plan; score usability, not agreement with an adult's plan.
  • Long-term assignments are infrequent, so plan how enough data points will be gathered.
  • Measure follow-through separately, for example by checkpoints met on time.

Progress-monitoring methods used in these templates

  • Task-analysis checklist: A routine is broken into ordered steps; each step is recorded as independent, supported, or not completed.
  • Rubric scoring: Work or performance is scored against written criteria with defined score levels.
  • Opportunity (trial) recording: Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Matching data sheets

Each template links to a blank sheet built for its measure. You can also download these sheets on their own:

  • Task-analysis checklist: Marks each step of a routine as independent, with support, or not completed across sessions.
  • Rubric tracker: Scores each rubric criterion and totals the score for each sample.
  • Opportunity tracker: Records each opportunity as independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Common mistakes when writing planning goals

  • Writing "will plan ahead" without naming the product or the steps that make a plan complete.
  • Measuring only the plan and assuming it was followed.
  • Using planning templates that are more complex than the assignment.
  • Expecting planning before the student can estimate time or identify subtasks.

Frequently asked questions

How can I get enough data if projects are rare?

Add short practice planning tasks, such as planning a two-day assignment or a lab, scored with the same checklist. Note which data came from practice tasks.

Should I score the plan or the outcome?

Both, ideally as separate measures. A plan goal shows the student can build a plan; a checkpoint goal shows whether the plan is used.

Is a graphic organizer the same as planning?

A graphic organizer can support planning, especially for writing. Planning goals usually focus on steps and timing rather than content organization, which belongs in writing goals.

References

IEP Atlas is a drafting aid. Every goal is a starting point that needs to be individualized from assessment data and reviewed by the IEP team. It does not determine compliance or appropriateness for any student.