Skip to content

Math problem solving IEP goal examples

By the IEP Atlas editorial teamLast updated

Short answer

A math problem solving IEP goal names the kind of word problem, what the student must show, and a criterion out of a fixed set. Example: given 10 mixed one-step and two-step word problems, the student will name the problem type, draw a diagram and solve 8 of 10 correctly, up from 3 of 10.

Problem solving goals are the hardest math goals to write well. "Will solve word problems with 80% accuracy" hides the real question: which part of the process breaks down. A student who cannot find the question needs a different goal from one who sets up the problem well and then miscounts.

Each of the 20 goals below targets one stage of the process, shows an illustrative baseline and links to the full template. The numbers are examples, not benchmarks. For the wider set of math goals (facts, computation, fractions, money), start with the math IEP goals pillar.

What a measurable problem solving goal includes

A problem solving goal needs the same four parts as any goal, plus one more detail: what counts as a correct answer.

  • Condition: the problem type, the number of steps, the number range and any tools (a calculator, a diagram template, a read-aloud).
  • Behavior: what the student writes, draws or says. "Solves" is too vague when you care about the setup.
  • Criterion: a count out of a fixed set, such as 8 of 10 problems, or rubric points out of a total.
  • Measurement: the probe, how often you give it and how you score it.

The IEP must state measurable annual goals and how progress on each will be measured.[1] Decide what "correct" means before the baseline. Does a right setup with a wrong sum count? Is a missing label an error? Write the rule on the data sheet so two scorers agree.

How to choose the right problem solving goal

Score 10 word problems from recent work by stage, not just right or wrong. Mark where each one first went wrong. The stage with the most first errors is usually the goal.

Student profileWhere it breaksSub-skill to targetMeasure
Reads the problem, then guesses an operationUnderstandingFind the question and the needed factsOpportunities out of 10
Adds every number in the problemProblem structureName the problem typeProblems set up correctly out of 10
Knows the type but writes the wrong equationRepresentationDraw a bar model or diagramDiagrams that match, out of 10
Sets up well, makes computation slipsSolvingOne-step or two-step accuracy, calculator allowedPercent of problems correct
Gives absurd answers without noticingCheckingEstimate and check reasonablenessOpportunities out of 5
Right answers, cannot show whyExplainingWritten solutionRubric points
Starts strong, stops halfwayRoutineFollow a step routineTask analysis steps

If computation is the real block, write a computation goal instead and allow a calculator in the problem solving goal. The math pillar has calculation goals.

Teach the structure: schema-based instruction

The federal practice guide on elementary math intervention recommends teaching students the structure of common word problem types, so they can sort a new problem into a known type.[2] The response to intervention guide makes the same recommendation for problems that share an underlying structure.[3] This approach is called schema-based instruction.

Problem type (schema)What happensExampleDiagram
Total (combine)Parts make a whole14 boys and 12 girls. How many students?Part, part, whole bar
Difference (compare)Two amounts are comparedAna has 30 cards. Ben has 18. How many more does Ana have?Two bars, gap marked
ChangeAn amount goes up or downTy had $20. He spent $7. How much is left?Start, change, end
Equal groupsGroups of the same size6 boxes with 8 pens each. How many pens?Groups times size
Comparison (times as many)One amount is a multiple of anotherA dog weighs 3 times as much as a cat that weighs 9 lb.Bar repeated 3 times
Ratio and rateTwo amounts change together4 cups of flour for 2 batches. How many for 5?Ratio table

For older students, the problem solving practice guide also recommends teaching students to monitor and reflect on their process, use visual representations and compare several strategies.[4] Goals for checking and explaining come from those recommendations.

Goals for understanding the problem

These suit students who start computing before they know what is being asked.

  • Finding the question: Given 10 one-step word problems read aloud, the student will underline and restate the question in their own words for 8 of 10 on 3 consecutive weekly probes. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template
  • Needed and extra information: Given 10 word problems that each include one extra number, the student will cross out the extra information and circle the needed facts for 9 of 10 problems (90%). Baseline: 4 of 10. Template
  • Retelling: Given a story problem read aloud, the student will retell who, what and the question before solving on 5 of 6 trials across 2 sessions. Baseline: 1 of 6. Template
  • Enough information: Given 10 problems, 3 of which are missing a needed fact, the student will say whether each can be solved and name what is missing on 8 of 10. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template

Weak: "The student will read word problems carefully." Measurable: the extra information goal, which says what the student marks and how many problems count.

Goals for representing and setting up the problem

  • Naming the problem type: Given 10 mixed additive word problems, the student will name the schema (total, difference or change) before solving for 8 of 10 on 3 of 4 weekly probes. Baseline: 4 of 10. Template
  • Bar models: Given 10 word problems, the student will draw a bar model that matches the problem structure for 8 of 10 on 2 consecutive probes. Baseline: 2 of 10. Template
  • Matching a picture model: Given a story problem and 3 picture models, the student will choose the matching model on 17 of 20 items (85%). Baseline: 6 of 20. Template
  • Mixed schema sets: Given a mixed set of 10 one-step and two-step problems, the student will name the schema, draw the diagram and solve 8 of 10 correctly on 3 weekly probes. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template

Weak: "The student will use strategies to solve problems." Measurable: the bar model goal, which names the strategy and how a match is judged.

Goals for solving one-step and two-step problems

  • One-step addition and subtraction: Given 10 one-step problems within 100, the student will write the equation and the labeled answer for 9 of 10 on 3 consecutive probes. Baseline: 4 of 10. Template
  • One-step multiplication and division: Given 10 one-step equal groups and comparison problems with a multiplication chart, the student will solve 8 of 10 on 2 consecutive probes. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template
  • Two-step mixed operations: Given 8 two-step problems that use two different operations, the student will solve 6 of 8 (75%) on 3 of 4 weekly probes. Baseline: 2 of 8. Template
  • Two-step within 20: Given 10 two-step story problems within 20 and counters, the student will solve 8 of 10 across 3 sessions. Baseline: 2 of 10. Template

Weak: "The student will solve two-step problems with 80% accuracy." Measurable: the mixed operations goal, which gives the denominator (8 problems) and a criterion set from the baseline.

Goals for checking and explaining

  • Estimating first: Given 5 multi-digit word problems, the student will write an estimate, solve, and state whether the answer is reasonable on 4 of 5, for 3 consecutive weeks. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template
  • Second method: Given 5 solved problems, the student will check each with a second strategy, such as the inverse operation on 4 of 5. Baseline: 0 of 5. Template
  • Explaining a solution: Given a solved word problem, the student will explain the steps in writing, scoring 5 of 6 points on a 3-point, 2-part rubric on 3 of 4 samples. Baseline: 2 of 6. Template
  • Self-check checklist: Given a 4-item self-check card after each multi-step problem, the student will complete every item and fix any error found on 4 of 5 problems. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template

Weak: "The student will check work." Measurable: the second method goal, which says how the student checks and how many problems count.

Goals for routines and real-world problems

  • Problem solving routine: Given a word problem and a step card (read, find the question, name the type, draw, solve, check, label), the student will complete 7 of 7 steps without prompts on 4 of 5 problems. Baseline: 3 of 7 steps. Template
  • Picture-supported routine: Given a picture routine card and a word problem with visuals, the student will complete 5 of 5 routine steps with no more than one gesture prompt. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template
  • Unit rate: Given 10 ratio and unit rate problems, the student will find the unit rate and use it to answer the question for 8 of 10 on 2 consecutive probes. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template
  • Consumer math: Given 10 problems with discount, sales tax or tip and a calculator, the student will find the final amount for 8 of 10 on 3 weekly probes. Baseline: 3 of 10. Template

Weak: "The student will apply math to real life." Measurable: the consumer math goal, which names the problem types and the tool. For money and community goals, see functional math IEP goals for high school.

Math problem solving goals for 6th grade

Grade 6 problems shift to ratios, rates, percents and expressions. The four goals that most often fit a 6th grader with a problem solving goal:

NeedGoalTemplate
Ratio and unit rateFind the unit rate and use it, 8 of 10Unit rate template
Extra informationSolve problems with extra numbers, 8 of 10Extra information template
Multi-step written workFull written solution, 9 of 12 rubric pointsMulti-step template
One-step equationsWrite and solve a one-step equation, 8 of 10Equation template

Use grade 6 problem contexts, but set the number range from the baseline. If the student is still building facts, allow a calculator and keep the goal about the setup. The middle school problem solving goals page has more.

How to measure progress on problem solving goals

Use a fixed probe: the same number of problems, the same mix of types, and new numbers each time. Score it the same way every week. Repeated short probes graphed over time are how a team sees whether the goal is on track.[5]

Goal typeMethodData sheetHow often
Problems correctPercent accuracy out of 8 or 10Accuracy data sheetWeekly
Setup or checking stepsOpportunities out of a setOpportunity data sheetWeekly
Written solutionsRubric pointsRubric scoring data sheetEvery 2 to 4 weeks
Step routinesTask analysisTask analysis data sheet2 times a week

On the accuracy sheet, add a column for the stage where each wrong problem broke down. After 4 weeks you can see whether the errors are moving from setup to computation, which is progress even if the score is flat.

Short-term objectives for problem solving goals

Step the goal by support or by problem difficulty. For the mixed schema goal:

  1. By the first report, given only total and change problems and a diagram template, the student will solve 7 of 10.
  2. By the second report, given all three additive types and the template, the student will solve 7 of 10.
  3. By the annual review, given mixed one-step and two-step problems with no template, the student will solve 8 of 10.

See the short-term objectives guide for other ways to break a goal down.

Adapting problem solving goals by grade band

Grade bandTypical problemsSupports to name in the conditionExample criterion
K to 2One-step within 20, acted outCounters, pictures, read-aloud5 of 6 trials
Grades 3 to 5One-step and two-step, all four operationsDiagram template, multiplication chart8 of 10 problems
Middle schoolRatios, percents, multi-step, equationsCalculator, step card9 of 12 rubric points
High schoolConsumer, job and budget problemsCalculator, real documents8 of 10 problems

Grade hubs list more: grades 3 to 5 math goals and middle school math goals. The full set of templates is on the problem solving goals page. Paste your draft into the goal checker before the meeting.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good IEP goal for math word problems?

One that targets the stage where the student breaks down. If the student adds every number, write a goal for naming the problem type and drawing a diagram, scored as problems set up correctly out of 10, rather than a general accuracy goal.

Can a student use a calculator on a problem solving goal?

Yes, if the goal is about setting up and solving the problem rather than computation. Name the calculator in the condition so every probe uses the same support. Write a separate computation goal if facts are also a need.

How do I score a word problem with the right setup but a wrong answer?

Decide before the baseline and write the rule on the data sheet. For a setup goal, count a correct equation or diagram as correct. For a solving goal, the answer must be right and labeled. A rubric can give credit for each part.

Use it in IEP Atlas

Sources

  1. 34 CFR §300.320: Definition of individualized education program, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
  2. Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: Intervention in the Elementary Grades, What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences
  3. Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: RtI for Elementary and Middle Schools, What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences
  4. Improving Mathematical Problem Solving in Grades 4 Through 8, What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences
  5. Progress Monitoring: Data & Goal Setting, National Center on Intensive Intervention

Written and checked by the IEP Atlas editorial team under our editorial policy. This guide describes general practice and federal rules. It is not legal advice; your state may add requirements, and the IEP team makes the decisions for each student.

IEP Atlas Pro

Turn your goals into progress reports

Pro tracks every goal on your caseload and drafts the report for you. Free for 14 days.

Count trials, prompts, and minutes live in the session; the graph and trend line draw themselves; progress reports are drafted from your data.