Skip to content

Write a letter or word sequence from memory after a brief look

K-2, 3-5Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who copy letter by letter because they cannot hold a word in mind, or who cannot reproduce a short letter string after seeing it for a few seconds. The string length a student can reproduce during a probe decides the starting condition; this supports copying and spelling.

Baseline
Give 10 strings at each of two lengths (3 and 4 letters) on two days and count strings reproduced exactly. Note whether the student uses a strategy (saying the letters) without being told; teaching the strategy usually produces a quick jump that should be reflected in the support options.
Tips
Use real words from the spelling list as items once nonsense strings are steady, which links the skill to spelling and copying. The classroom payoff is copying in chunks rather than letter by letter; probe copying speed to see the effect.
Limits
Memory for letter strings is affected by whether the student can name the letters and read the word; use letters the student knows. Does not measure spelling knowledge. Long exposure times turn the task into copying.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID mt-vm-010.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a 4-letter string shown for 5 seconds and then covered, the student will write the letters in the correct order from memory independently with at least 85% accuracy on strings written correctly from memory, across 3 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly on a 10-item memory probe.

Baseline: 30% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Visual-Motor & Visual-Perceptual Skills.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Motor & Sensory Skills (OT, PT & Adapted PE) - Visual-Motor & Visual-Perceptual Skills
Baseline
30% accuracy.
Annual goal370 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a 4-letter string shown for 5 seconds and then covered, the student will write the letters in the correct order from memory independently with at least 85% accuracy on strings written correctly from memory, across 3 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly on a 10-item memory probe.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a 4-letter string shown for 5 seconds and then covered
Behavior
The student will write the letters in the correct order from memory independently
Criteria
With at least 85% accuracy on strings written correctly from memory, across 3 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Opportunity-by-opportunity data
Schedule
Weekly on a 10-item memory probe

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.