Skip to content

Explain what someone who missed it thinks

K-2, 3-5Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who assume others know what they know, which can lead to confusing stories and misunderstandings. Present levels decide fit. Classic set-ups: an object moved while a character is away, or a box with a surprise inside.

Baseline
Use 10 stories with varied objects and settings. Score correct when the student answers from the character's view, not their own.
Tips
Act stories out with toys for younger students. Ask "why" to see the reasoning. Tie it to real life: telling a friend who was absent what happened.
Limits
Story tasks do not show the student will apply it in conversation. Results depend on language skills; keep sentences short and allow any response mode.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID se-aw-009.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short acted-out or illustrated stories in which one character misses an event (such as an object being moved), the student will say what the character who missed the event will think or do and why independently with at least 70% accuracy on missed-event stories, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.

Baseline: 30% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Social Awareness & Perspective Taking.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Social-Emotional & Communication - Social Awareness & Perspective Taking
Baseline
30% accuracy.
Annual goal404 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short acted-out or illustrated stories in which one character misses an event (such as an object being moved), the student will say what the character who missed the event will think or do and why independently with at least 70% accuracy on missed-event stories, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 10 short acted-out or illustrated stories in which one character misses an event (such as an object being moved)
Behavior
The student will say what the character who missed the event will think or do and why independently
Criteria
With at least 70% accuracy on missed-event stories, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Opportunity-by-opportunity data
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.