Skip to content

Identify moments of stuttering in the SLP's speech

K-2, 3-5Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who stutter and are starting to learn about stuttering: what a repetition, prolongation, or block sounds like, in someone else's speech first. Base the choice on the SLP's fluency evaluation. This is a learning-about-stuttering goal, never a goal to speak without stuttering.

Baseline
Present 10 sentences, about half with a modeled moment of stuttering, and record each identification. Also ask the student what they call stuttering and how they describe it; use their words where possible.
Tips
Score correct when the student's identification matches what the SLP modeled. Keep the mix near half and half. Use neutral, friendly words for stuttering types that the student helps choose. The purpose is to make stuttering something the student can talk about openly, so keep the tone playful and never frame stuttering as bad.
Limits
Identifying stuttering in others is a first step and says nothing about the student's own speech or feelings about it. Not every student needs or wants this goal; the student and SLP decide together.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID sl-flu-006.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, when the SLP says 10 sentences, some containing a modeled repetition, prolongation, or block and some without, the student will identify each sentence that contains a moment of stuttering by raising a card or saying "bumpy" independently with at least 90% accuracy on identifications of modeled stuttering, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.

Baseline: 50% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Speech Fluency (Stuttering).

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Speech & Language - Speech Fluency (Stuttering)
Baseline
50% accuracy.
Annual goal462 characters
By the annual IEP review date, when the SLP says 10 sentences, some containing a modeled repetition, prolongation, or block and some without, the student will identify each sentence that contains a moment of stuttering by raising a card or saying "bumpy" independently with at least 90% accuracy on identifications of modeled stuttering, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
When the SLP says 10 sentences, some containing a modeled repetition, prolongation, or block and some without
Behavior
The student will identify each sentence that contains a moment of stuttering by raising a card or saying "bumpy" independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on identifications of modeled stuttering, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions
Evaluation method
Opportunity-by-opportunity data
Schedule
During each therapy session

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.