Skip to content
IEP Atlas
Menu

Speech Fluency (Stuttering) IEP goals

Speech fluency goals for students who stutter focus on what the student chooses to work on: using a speech strategy, speaking up in class instead of avoiding it, and explaining stuttering to others. Stuttering varies by situation and day, so goals do not make fluent speech or zero stuttering the target. The SLP and student set these goals together, and stuttering while speaking always counts as speaking.

5 templates · Not yet educator-reviewed · How we write and review goals

Sample speech fluency (stuttering) goals

Numbers are illustrative. Set targets from the student's own baseline data.

  • Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Use a chosen fluency-shaping strategy in structured speaking tasks

    Fluency-shaping strategies in structured tasks

    By the annual IEP review date, during 10 structured speaking turns with the SLP (e.g., saying sentences, answering questions, or reading aloud), the student will use their chosen fluency-shaping strategy (e.g., easy onset or light articulatory contact) at the start of the speaking turn independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Use a stuttering-modification strategy during a moment of stuttering

    Stuttering-modification strategies

    By the annual IEP review date, when a moment of stuttering occurs during a structured conversation with the SLP, the student will use a pullout (easing out of the stuttered word) or a cancellation (pausing, then saying the word again with an easier form) during the moment of stuttering independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Use a chosen speech strategy during class speaking turns

    Strategy use in class

    By the annual IEP review date, during class speaking turns (e.g., answering a question, reading a sentence aloud, or sharing with a partner), the student will use their chosen speech strategy (e.g., easy onset, light contact, a pullout, or a cancellation) during the speaking turn independently in at least 3 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive monthly classroom observations, as measured by direct observation collected monthly, with a student self-report after each observed class.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Frequency

    Volunteer to speak in class discussions

    Participating in speaking situations

    By the annual IEP review date, during a 45-minute general education class period with whole-class or small-group discussion, the student will volunteer to speak (e.g., raise a hand to answer, share an idea, or ask a question) during class discussion independently at least 3 times per 45-minute class period, across 3 consecutive observed class periods, as measured by frequency recording collected every two weeks.

    Customize this goalFrequency & rate tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Rubric score

    Explain stuttering and what helps to a teacher or classmates

    Self-advocacy and education about stuttering

    By the annual IEP review date, when preparing a short presentation, letter, or video about stuttering for a teacher or classmates, the student will explain what stuttering is, what it is like for them, and what listeners can do to help independently, earning a score of at least 6 out of 8 on a 4-row stuttering self-advocacy rubric scored 0–2 per row, on 2 consecutive rehearsals and one real presentation or meeting, as measured by a defined scoring rubric collected every two weeks during preparation.

    Customize this goalRubric tracker

Speech & Language · Speech Fluency (Stuttering)

Customize a goal

Student reference

Use a generic label rather than a student's name. Review goals within your school's approved IEP system.

Current baseline

Sample numbers are illustrative. Set the baseline and target from the student's own assessment data and team judgment.

Condition

Setting, materials, or situation, such as a passage level or a work period.

Observable behavior

Something an adult can see, count, or time. Avoid “understand,” “improve,” or “know.”

Level of support

Say exactly what support counts, such as “with one verbal prompt.” Leave “independently” if none.

Criterion

Number of opportunities in which the behavior is demonstrated, out of a fixed number.

Measurement method

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Mastery rule

Timeframe and monitoring

You can type a date, such as “By May 15, 2027”.

Match the schedule to the skill. Fluency often uses weekly probes. Writing rubrics may be scored every few weeks.

Live goal preview

By the annual IEP review date, during 10 structured speaking turns with the SLP (e.g., saying sentences, answering questions, or reading aloud), the student will use their chosen fluency-shaping strategy (e.g., easy onset or light articulatory contact) at the start of the speaking turn independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.

Baseline: 3 of 10 opportunities.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method
Add objectivesMatching data sheet

Measurability check10 of 10 met

All structural checks are met.

  • Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording can produce opportunities data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Speech Fluency (Stuttering).

  • Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.

What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.

Build objectives by

Matching data sheet

Opportunity tracker. Your goal counts opportunities, so the sheet has one box per opportunity in each session.

Opportunity tracker

Opportunities
Student label:
 
Target:
in at least 8 of 10 opportunities
Mastery rule:
across 3 consecutive therapy sessions
Collection schedule:
during each therapy session
Method:
Opportunity (trial) recording
Data collector:
 

Goal: By the annual IEP review date, during 10 structured speaking turns with the SLP (e.g., saying sentences, answering questions, or reading aloud), the student will use their chosen fluency-shaping strategy (e.g., easy onset or light articulatory contact) at the start of the speaking turn independently in at least 8 of 10 opportunities, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.

Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred

Opportunity tracker
DateActivity / context12345678910# + (of 10)Notes

Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.

  • Record up to 10 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
  • Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
  • Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.

Prefer more room? Open this template in the full builder.

skill_page

What speech fluency (stuttering) involves

  • Using fluency-shaping strategies such as easy onset or light contact in structured tasks
  • Using stuttering-modification strategies such as pullouts and cancellations
  • Using a chosen strategy during class speaking turns
  • Volunteering to speak instead of avoiding speaking situations
  • Explaining stuttering and what helps to teachers and classmates

Baseline and measurement considerations

  • Score strategy use as taught, not whether stuttering occurred; stuttering is never scored as an error.
  • Use opportunities for strategy goals (speaking turns or moments of stuttering) and frequency for participation.
  • Pair observer data with the student's own report, especially for avoidance and classroom use.
  • Expect variation by setting, listener, and day; look at trends over several weeks.

Progress-monitoring methods used in these templates

  • Opportunity (trial) recording: Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Direct observation: An adult observes and records the defined behavior during a specified activity.
  • Frequency (event) recording: Each occurrence of a clearly defined behavior is tallied during a fixed observation period.
  • Rubric scoring: Work or performance is scored against written criteria with defined score levels.

Matching data sheets

Each template links to a blank sheet built for its measure. You can also download these sheets on their own:

  • Opportunity tracker: Records each opportunity as independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Frequency & rate tracker: Counts a defined behavior during a fixed observation period. Calculates rate when time is recorded.
  • Rubric tracker: Scores each rubric criterion and totals the score for each sample.

Common mistakes when writing speech fluency (stuttering) goals

  • Writing "will speak fluently" or setting a target of zero stuttering.
  • Choosing a strategy for the student instead of with them.
  • Counting only fluent participation, which can increase avoidance.
  • Measuring only in the speech room.

Frequently asked questions

Why not use percent syllables stuttered as the goal?

Stuttering frequency varies a lot across situations and days, and making it the goal can push students to avoid speaking or hide stuttering. Many SLPs track it as background information but set goals for strategy use, participation, and communication attitudes chosen with the student.

What is the difference between fluency shaping and stuttering modification?

Fluency shaping changes how speech is produced overall, for example with easy onsets or light contact. Stuttering modification changes the stuttering moment itself, for example with a pullout or cancellation, to make it easier and less tense. The SLP and student choose what fits.

How can teachers support a student who stutters?

Wait for the student to finish, keep listening naturally, and avoid finishing words or saying "slow down." Ask the student privately how they want to handle reading aloud and presentations.

Do these goals need short-term objectives or benchmarks?

Federal regulations require short-term objectives or benchmarks only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Many states and districts require them more broadly, so check local policy. The builder can generate objectives from a template's progression steps or from intermediate targets.

References

IEP Atlas is a drafting aid. Every goal is a starting point that needs to be individualized from assessment data and reviewed by the IEP team. It does not determine compliance or appropriateness for any student.