Recall key points from a classmate's presentation
When to use this goal
For students who pay attention to teachers but retain little when classmates present, which is a large part of project-based classes. Base the choice on comprehension checks after peer presentations and teacher report.
- Baseline
- After three or four peer presentations, ask three questions each and score answers. Note whether the student can hear the presenter clearly from their seat; seating and microphones may matter more than strategy.
- Tips
- Coordinate with the teacher for presentation days. Score for meaning in any language or mode. If peers speak quietly, a class microphone or seating change is an accommodation, not a reason to lower the goal.
- Limits
- Peer presentations vary in clarity and organization; note poorly organized ones. The goal does not cover giving feedback to peers.
Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID sl-lis-036.
Sign in to add this goal to a student.
Goal
By the annual IEP review date, after a classmate's 2- to 4-minute presentation or project share in the general education classroom, the student will answer three questions about the presentation's topic and main points independently with at least 80% accuracy on questions about peer presentations, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Baseline: 40% accuracy.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check11 of 11 met
Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.
Met: Condition. Stated.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.
Met: Review timeframe. Stated.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Listening Comprehension & Auditory Processing.
Met: Level of support. Defined.
Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.
Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.
Paste into your IEP system
Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.
- Area of need
- Speech & Language - Listening Comprehension & Auditory Processing
- Baseline
- 40% accuracy.
- Annual goal389 characters
- By the annual IEP review date, after a classmate's 2- to 4-minute presentation or project share in the general education classroom, the student will answer three questions about the presentation's topic and main points independently with at least 80% accuracy on questions about peer presentations, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
- Timeframe
- By the annual IEP review date
- Condition
- After a classmate's 2- to 4-minute presentation or project share in the general education classroom
- Behavior
- The student will answer three questions about the presentation's topic and main points independently
- Criteria
- With at least 80% accuracy on questions about peer presentations, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Evaluation method
- Work-sample analysis
- Schedule
- Weekly
Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.
Matching data sheet
Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.
Accuracy tracker
Percent accuracy- Student label:
- Target:
- with at least 80% accuracy on questions about peer presentations
- Mastery rule:
- in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Work-sample analysis
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, after a classmate's 2- to 4-minute presentation or project share in the general education classroom, the student will answer three questions about the presentation's topic and main points independently with at least 80% accuracy on questions about peer presentations, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
| Date | Task / materials | # correct | # attempted | % accuracycorrect ÷ attempted × 100 | Support levele.g., independent, 1 verbal prompt | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Score only items the student attempted unless the goal defines a fixed set of items. Use the same denominator every session.
- Percent = numerator ÷ denominator × 100. Round to one decimal place.
- Record the support actually provided, even if the goal is independent performance.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.