Skip to content

Point to pictures for describing words

PK, K-2Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For young students who know many nouns but not describing words (wet, dry, broken, empty, full, clean, dirty, hot, cold, soft). Describing words help with directions, books, and later describing. Base the choice on the SLP's assessment and the student's daily vocabulary.

Baseline
Test 10 describing words in pairs (wet and dry tested on different trials) and record which are known. Use pictures where the only difference is the target feature.
Tips
Score correct when the student selects the item that matches. Use the opposite as the foil once the student has the word. Accept any reliable response (pointing, eye-gaze selection on a board, or touching the item).
Limits
Pictures of some describing words are unclear; real objects are often better. The goal does not measure saying the words.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID sl-rec-038.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 10 sets of 2 to 3 pictures that differ by one describing word (such as a wet towel and a dry towel), the student will point to the picture or object that matches the describing word independently with at least 85% accuracy on describing-word items, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.

Baseline: 40% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Receptive Language.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Speech & Language - Receptive Language
Baseline
40% accuracy.
Annual goal410 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 sets of 2 to 3 pictures that differ by one describing word (such as a wet towel and a dry towel), the student will point to the picture or object that matches the describing word independently with at least 85% accuracy on describing-word items, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected during each therapy session.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 10 sets of 2 to 3 pictures that differ by one describing word (such as a wet towel and a dry towel)
Behavior
The student will point to the picture or object that matches the describing word independently
Criteria
With at least 85% accuracy on describing-word items, across 3 consecutive therapy sessions
Evaluation method
Opportunity-by-opportunity data
Schedule
During each therapy session

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.