Skip to content

Plan a week of dinners

9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who cook a few meals but decide what to eat at the last minute, which leads to missing ingredients and repeat meals. Fit depends on present levels in reading and planning, and on the student's interest in cooking, not grade.

Baseline
Collect 2 or 3 weekly plans before setting the target. Score each day's dinner as meeting all the rules or not; agree on the rules with the student first so the plan is theirs.
Tips
Use the student's own food preferences and cultural foods; the rules are about planning, not about a particular diet. Follow the plan with a grocery list goal so the plan leads to shopping.
Limits
A plan on paper does not show the student cooks it; check a few planned meals. Diet changes from a doctor or dietitian override the planning rules.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID tn-il-008.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a blank weekly meal planner, a list of meals the student can cook, and the week's schedule, the student will fill in a dinner for each day of the week that follows the planning rules independently with at least 85% accuracy on planned dinners checked against the planning rules, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly plans, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 45% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Independent Living.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Transition & Postsecondary Skills - Independent Living
Baseline
45% accuracy.
Annual goal405 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a blank weekly meal planner, a list of meals the student can cook, and the week's schedule, the student will fill in a dinner for each day of the week that follows the planning rules independently with at least 85% accuracy on planned dinners checked against the planning rules, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly plans, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a blank weekly meal planner, a list of meals the student can cook, and the week's schedule
Behavior
The student will fill in a dinner for each day of the week that follows the planning rules independently
Criteria
With at least 85% accuracy on planned dinners checked against the planning rules, on 3 of 4 consecutive weekly plans
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.