Write sentences with subject-verb agreement
When to use this goal
For students whose writing shows agreement errors (he go, they was) that may or may not appear in their speech. Present levels in oral language matter: if the errors also occur in speech, coordinate with the SLP so the written goal matches the language goal.
- Baseline
- Give two probes of 10 sentences with a balance of singular and plural subjects, including a few with phrases between subject and verb. Record errors by subject type; errors with compound subjects and with there is or there are are common and may need separate items. Also check three writing samples for the same errors.
- Tips
- For students whose home dialect or first language uses different agreement patterns, teach the school-writing form as a code to use in writing without treating speech as wrong. Reading sentences aloud helps many students hear the mismatch. Use own writing as the transfer condition.
- Limits
- Fill-in items with two choices allow 50% by chance; use enough items and look at error patterns. Agreement in own writing is hard to count when sentences are fragments. Dialect differences can make scoring contentious; agree on the standard being taught.
Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID wr-mec-009.
Sign in to add this goal to a student.
Goal
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 sentences with the verb missing and two verb forms to choose from, the student will write the verb form that agrees with the subject in each sentence independently with at least 90% accuracy on subject-verb pairs, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Baseline: 50% accuracy.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check11 of 11 met
Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.
Met: Condition. Stated.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.
Met: Review timeframe. Stated.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Capitalization, Punctuation & Grammar.
Met: Level of support. Defined.
Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.
Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.
Paste into your IEP system
Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.
- Area of need
- Writing - Capitalization, Punctuation & Grammar
- Baseline
- 50% accuracy.
- Annual goal344 characters
- By the annual IEP review date, given 10 sentences with the verb missing and two verb forms to choose from, the student will write the verb form that agrees with the subject in each sentence independently with at least 90% accuracy on subject-verb pairs, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
- Timeframe
- By the annual IEP review date
- Condition
- Given 10 sentences with the verb missing and two verb forms to choose from
- Behavior
- The student will write the verb form that agrees with the subject in each sentence independently
- Criteria
- With at least 90% accuracy on subject-verb pairs, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Evaluation method
- Work-sample analysis
- Schedule
- Weekly
Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.
Matching data sheet
Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.
Accuracy tracker
Percent accuracy- Student label:
- Target:
- with at least 90% accuracy on subject-verb pairs
- Mastery rule:
- in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Work-sample analysis
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, given 10 sentences with the verb missing and two verb forms to choose from, the student will write the verb form that agrees with the subject in each sentence independently with at least 90% accuracy on subject-verb pairs, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
| Date | Task / materials | # correct | # attempted | % accuracycorrect ÷ attempted × 100 | Support levele.g., independent, 1 verbal prompt | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Score only items the student attempted unless the goal defines a fixed set of items. Use the same denominator every session.
- Percent = numerator ÷ denominator × 100. Round to one decimal place.
- Record the support actually provided, even if the goal is independent performance.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.