Skip to content

Explain each detail with a follow-up sentence

3-5, 6-8Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students whose paragraphs list facts one sentence each with nothing connecting them to the topic. Present levels should show paragraphs with a topic sentence and details; the target is one elaboration sentence after each detail.

Baseline
In three paragraphs, mark each detail and score it as elaborated when the next sentence explains, gives an example, or tells why it matters. The denominator is the number of details.
Tips
Teach elaboration with a simple pattern (detail, then tell more). Color-code details and elaborations in model paragraphs. This prepares students for evidence-and-explanation body paragraphs later.
Limits
The measure checks that elaboration is there, not how strong it is. Paragraphs with few details give coarse percentages. Content knowledge affects how much the student can elaborate.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID wr-par-028.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, when writing an informational paragraph with at least three details, the student will follow each detail with a sentence that explains it, gives an example, or tells why it matters to the topic independently with at least 75% accuracy on details in the paragraph, on 3 of 4 consecutive scored paragraphs, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 20% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Paragraph Organization.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Writing - Paragraph Organization
Baseline
20% accuracy.
Annual goal389 characters
By the annual IEP review date, when writing an informational paragraph with at least three details, the student will follow each detail with a sentence that explains it, gives an example, or tells why it matters to the topic independently with at least 75% accuracy on details in the paragraph, on 3 of 4 consecutive scored paragraphs, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
When writing an informational paragraph with at least three details
Behavior
The student will follow each detail with a sentence that explains it, gives an example, or tells why it matters to the topic independently
Criteria
With at least 75% accuracy on details in the paragraph, on 3 of 4 consecutive scored paragraphs
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.