Skip to content

Cross out the sentence that does not belong

3-5Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who include off-topic sentences in their writing and do not notice them when rereading. Present levels should show the student can name the topic of a short paragraph; the probe isolates spotting the sentence that breaks it.

Baseline
Give two probes of eight paragraphs. Score a paragraph correct when the off-topic sentence is crossed out and the reason fits. Make the off-topic sentences related enough to require thought (about the same broad subject, not a different subject).
Tips
Move from teacher-made paragraphs to the student's own drafts once the probe is easy. The written reason shows whether the student is checking against the topic sentence or guessing.
Limits
Finding off-topic sentences in given paragraphs is easier than in one's own writing. Reading level affects scores; keep passages easy. The goal pairs with the existing staying-on-topic goal for own writing.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID wr-par-030.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given eight short paragraphs that each contain one off-topic sentence, the student will cross out the sentence that does not fit the topic sentence and write a few words that explain why it does not belong independently with at least 90% accuracy on paragraphs, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 40% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Paragraph Organization.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Writing - Paragraph Organization
Baseline
40% accuracy.
Annual goal383 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given eight short paragraphs that each contain one off-topic sentence, the student will cross out the sentence that does not fit the topic sentence and write a few words that explain why it does not belong independently with at least 90% accuracy on paragraphs, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given eight short paragraphs that each contain one off-topic sentence
Behavior
The student will cross out the sentence that does not fit the topic sentence and write a few words that explain why it does not belong independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on paragraphs, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.