Spelling accommodations: spell-check, word banks and 14 more for the IEP
By the IEP Atlas editorial teamLast updated
Short answer
Spelling accommodations let a student show content knowledge without misspellings costing the grade. The most used are spell-check, word prediction, personal word banks and not scoring spelling in content classes. Spelling test changes, such as fewer words, are usually modifications. Write each with what, when, how much and who provides it, and keep teaching spelling alongside.
Spelling is one of the few areas where the same support is an accommodation in one class and a modification in the next. Spell-check on a science lab report is an accommodation: the grade is about science. Spell-check on the weekly spelling test removes the skill being tested. Every item below is marked with that in mind.
These 16 examples are worded the way they should read in the IEP. For accommodations in general, start with the pillar on IEP accommodations. For writing supports beyond spelling, such as speech-to-text and graphic organizers, see writing accommodations for the IEP.
Decide what the grade is measuring
Before you pick a spelling accommodation, ask one question for each class: is spelling part of the standard this grade reports on?
| Class or task | Is spelling graded here? | What that means for accommodations |
|---|---|---|
| Science, social studies, math written responses | Usually no | Remove spelling from scoring; tools like spell-check are accommodations |
| ELA writing (essays, responses) | Partly, under conventions | Tools are accommodations; the conventions row of the rubric may need a team decision |
| Spelling test or word study check | Yes, it is the whole standard | Tools that supply spellings are modifications; changes to how the test is given can be accommodations |
| State writing tests | Depends on the state rubric | Follow the state's allowed list; many limit spell-check and word prediction |
That table answers most disagreements before they start. A spelling accommodation is fair wherever spelling is not the skill being measured.
Tools: spell-check, word prediction and word banks
| Accommodation as written in the IEP | Type | Effect on grading and testing |
|---|---|---|
| 1. The student may use spell-check on typed work in all classes, except on spelling tests and word study checks. | Accommodation | None outside spelling tests. Check the state manual for state writing tests |
| 2. The student may use word prediction software on typed work in all classes, except on spelling tests. | Accommodation | None outside spelling tests; often restricted on state tests |
| 3. A personal word bank of 20 to 30 words the student often misspells is kept in the writing folder. The special education teacher updates it monthly from work samples. | Accommodation | None on assignments; not used on spelling tests |
| 4. A unit vocabulary list with correct spellings is posted or given to all students during content-area writing. | Accommodation | None |
| 5. The student may use a handheld electronic speller or an approved dictionary app during writing in all classes. | Accommodation | None outside spelling tests |
Spell-check helps less than people expect when the student's attempt is far from the target. If the student writes "sukses" for "success," a spell-checker will usually suggest the right word. If the student writes "sksz," the tool offers nothing useful. Look at the student's misspellings before writing item 1 into the IEP. If more than half of them are unrecognizable, word prediction (item 2) usually works better.
Scoring accommodations
| Accommodation as written in the IEP | Type | Effect on grading and testing |
|---|---|---|
| 6. Spelling errors are not counted in grades for science, social studies and math, except for unit vocabulary words that are posted. | Accommodation | None; the content grade reflects content |
| 7. On ELA writing rubrics, spelling is scored only on words from the student's current spelling level and word bank. | Modification | Changes the conventions criterion. Note it as your district requires |
| 8. Teachers mark misspellings in a separate color and do not take points off, so the student can see patterns without losing credit. | Accommodation in content classes | None outside ELA conventions |
Item 7 is a modification because it changes the standard on one rubric row. That can be the right call. Just label it honestly, so the report card and the parents get an accurate picture. The grading students with IEPs guide covers how districts note modified grades.
Spelling test accommodations
These change how a spelling test is given, not how many words or which words. They stay accommodations.
| Accommodation as written in the IEP | Type | Effect on grading and testing |
|---|---|---|
| 9. Spelling tests are given in a small group or one to one, with each word said, used in a sentence and repeated up to 2 times. | Accommodation | None |
| 10. The student may say each letter aloud while an adult writes it, or type the words, in place of handwriting the test. | Accommodation | None, if the adult writes only the letters the student names |
| 11. The student receives wide-spaced lines and numbered boxes on the spelling test paper. | Accommodation | None |
| 12. Partial credit is given for correct letter sequences on spelling tests, reported next to the whole-word score. | Accommodation for reporting | The whole-word score is unchanged; the second score shows growth |
Item 12 is worth a closer look. A student who moves from "bt" to "bot" to "boat" is learning, but whole-word scoring shows 0, 0, 1. Correct letter sequences show the progress the whole-word score hides, and that matters for a student who is easy to discourage.
Spelling test modifications
| Accommodation as written in the IEP | Type | Effect on grading and testing |
|---|---|---|
| 13. The student is tested on 10 of the 20 weekly words, chosen by the special education teacher from the student's spelling pattern. | Modification | Changes the expectation. Note it on the report card as your district requires |
| 14. The student studies and is tested on a different word list matched to their phonics level, in place of the class list. | Modification | Changes the content. Grade against the student's own list and say so |
| 15. Weekly spelling tests are replaced with a monthly dictation of 5 sentences using the target pattern. | Modification | Changes how the standard is assessed; agree on it as a team |
Item 14 is often the most useful modification for a student with dyslexia. Grade-level lists ask a student who cannot yet spell short vowel words to memorize words like "decision." A list matched to the phonics pattern the student is learning builds real skill. Pair it with a spelling goal. See accommodations for dyslexia for the wider set of supports.
Self-advocacy item
| Accommodation as written in the IEP | Type | Effect on grading and testing |
|---|---|---|
| 16. The student may ask any adult how to spell up to 3 words per writing assignment without penalty, in all classes. | Accommodation | None outside spelling tests |
This one teaches the student to ask for help with a clear limit. Older students can move from asking an adult to using a tool on their own.
Worked example: a 3rd grader on a grade-level list
Illustrative numbers. A 3rd grader scores 4 of 20 words correct on the weekly test (20%) for 6 weeks in a row. His correct letter sequences on those tests average 38 of 104 possible (37%). In science, his lab responses are graded down for spelling and average 61%.
The team adds items 1, 6 and 12, and modifies the weekly test to a list matched to his phonics level (item 14). After 6 weeks, his science responses average 82%, because the grade now measures science. On his matched list he scores 14 of 20 words correct. His correct letter sequences on a grade-level probe given every 2 weeks rise from 37% to 48%.
That last number is the honest progress measure, because it uses the grade-level list without the modification. Track it on the accuracy data sheet. Spelling measures are explained on the percent accuracy measurement page.
Pair accommodations with a spelling goal
Accommodations stop spelling from hiding what the student knows. They do not teach spelling. If the student is more than a year behind, the IEP also needs a goal and instruction. Templates are in the spelling goals library, and the guide to spelling IEP goals has worked examples by pattern.
The IEP lists the supplementary aids, services and program modifications the student needs, along with testing accommodations.[1] State test rules decide whether spell-check and word prediction are allowed on state writing tests,[2] and those rules change. Check the current manual every year.
Mistakes to avoid
- Weak: "Spelling not graded." Better: name the classes, the exceptions (spelling tests, posted vocabulary) and who tells the teachers.
- Weak: "Shortened spelling list." Better: say how many words, who chooses them, and label it a modification.
- Weak: "Spell-check" with no device named. Better: say on which device and whether it is available on tests.
Frequently asked questions
Is spell-check an accommodation or a modification?
Spell-check is an accommodation on any task where spelling is not the skill being graded, such as a science report. On a spelling test it supplies the answer, so using it there would be a modification.
Can a student with an IEP have a shorter spelling list?
Yes, if the IEP team decides it, but a shorter or different list is a modification because it changes what the student is expected to learn. Districts may note modified grades on report cards.
Is spell-check allowed on state writing tests?
It depends on the state. Some allow spell-check or word prediction as an accommodation for students whose IEP lists it, and some do not. Check the current state testing manual.
Use it in IEP Atlas
- Spelling goals (writing)
- Correct letter sequences in the IEP glossary
- Accommodation in the IEP glossary
- Modification in the IEP glossary
- Accuracy data sheet
Related guides
- IEP accommodations: how to choose, write and track them
- Writing accommodations for the IEP: 20 examples, including dysgraphia
- Math accommodations for the IEP: 16 examples, including dyscalculia
- Accommodations vs modifications: 30 side-by-side examples
- UDL vs accommodations
Sources
- 34 CFR §300.320: Definition of individualized education program, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- 34 CFR §300.160: Participation in assessments, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
Written and checked by the IEP Atlas editorial team under our editorial policy. This guide describes general practice and federal rules. It is not legal advice; your state may add requirements, and the IEP team makes the decisions for each student.