Skip to content

Troubleshoot a hearing aid with a checklist

3-5, 6-8Task-analysis stepsTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who notice when a hearing aid stops working or sounds wrong and are ready to try simple fixes before calling an adult. Present levels in device parts and in naming problems decide fit.

Baseline
Set up three known problems on a practice device and mark each step. Also log real problems and what the student did.
Tips
Students should never take apart parts the audiologist has not shown them. Reporting is a required step even when the fix works.
Limits
Some problems need the audiologist. Hearing technology is one access route the family and student chose; it does not replace sign language, captions, or other visual access where the student uses them.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ac-ht-012.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Number of routine steps performed independently.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Task-analysis steps

Write each step so an observer can mark it done or not done.

Criterion wording

Data collection

A routine is broken into ordered steps; each step is recorded as independent, supported, or not completed.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, when the student's hearing aid is dead, weak, whistling, or sounds distorted, the student will work through the troubleshooting checklist, try each fix in order, and report the result, performing all 6 steps independently, on 4 consecutive practice or real problems, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected weekly and whenever a real problem occurs.

Baseline: 2 of 6 steps independently.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Task-analysis steps fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Task-analysis checklist gives task-analysis steps data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Hearing Technology Self-Management.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Vision, Hearing & Assistive Technology - Hearing Technology Self-Management
Baseline
2 of 6 steps independently.
Annual goal391 characters
By the annual IEP review date, when the student's hearing aid is dead, weak, whistling, or sounds distorted, the student will work through the troubleshooting checklist, try each fix in order, and report the result, performing all 6 steps independently, on 4 consecutive practice or real problems, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected weekly and whenever a real problem occurs.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
When the student's hearing aid is dead, weak, whistling, or sounds distorted
Behavior
The student will work through the troubleshooting checklist, try each fix in order, and report the result
Criteria
Performing all 6 steps independently, on 4 consecutive practice or real problems
Evaluation method
A task-analysis checklist
Schedule
Weekly and whenever a real problem occurs

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Task-analysis checklist. Marks each step in each session.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.