Make a change suggested by a peer reviewer
When to use this goal
For students who accept teacher feedback but reject peer suggestions on drafts or projects out of hand. Fits classes with structured peer review. Present levels decide the number of suggestions expected per review.
- Baseline
- Compare drafts before and after three or four peer reviews and record whether any peer suggestion was used. Ask the student why a suggestion was not used; a reasoned refusal is different from not considering it.
- Tips
- Each peer review is one opportunity; met means at least one peer suggestion used and marked. The student keeps authority over their work by choosing which suggestion; that choice is part of the skill. Make sure peers are trained to give specific suggestions.
- Limits
- Peer suggestions vary in quality; a weak suggestion is fair to decline with a reason. Does not measure the quality of the revision.
Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ef-cf-034.
Sign in to add this goal to a student.
Goal
By the annual IEP review date, after a structured peer review of a draft or project, with the peer's written suggestions, the student will choose at least one peer suggestion, make that change in the draft, and mark it independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, on 4 of 5 consecutive peer reviews, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected each peer review.
Baseline: 1 of 5 opportunities.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check11 of 11 met
Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.
Met: Condition. Stated.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities fits this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives opportunities data.
Met: Review timeframe. Stated.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Cognitive Flexibility.
Met: Level of support. Defined.
Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.
Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.
Paste into your IEP system
Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.
- Area of need
- Executive Function - Cognitive Flexibility
- Baseline
- 1 of 5 opportunities.
- Annual goal377 characters
- By the annual IEP review date, after a structured peer review of a draft or project, with the peer's written suggestions, the student will choose at least one peer suggestion, make that change in the draft, and mark it independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, on 4 of 5 consecutive peer reviews, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected each peer review.
- Timeframe
- By the annual IEP review date
- Condition
- After a structured peer review of a draft or project, with the peer's written suggestions
- Behavior
- The student will choose at least one peer suggestion, make that change in the draft, and mark it independently
- Criteria
- In at least 4 of 5 opportunities, on 4 of 5 consecutive peer reviews
- Evaluation method
- Opportunity-by-opportunity data
- Schedule
- Each peer review
Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.
Matching data sheet
Opportunity tracker. One box per opportunity in each session.
Opportunity tracker
Opportunities- Student label:
- Target:
- in at least 4 of 5 opportunities
- Mastery rule:
- on 4 of 5 consecutive peer reviews
- Collection schedule:
- each peer review
- Method:
- Opportunity (trial) recording
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, after a structured peer review of a draft or project, with the peer's written suggestions, the student will choose at least one peer suggestion, make that change in the draft, and mark it independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, on 4 of 5 consecutive peer reviews, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected each peer review.
Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred
| Date | Activity / context | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | # + (of 5) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Record up to 5 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
- Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
- Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.