Skip to content

Make a mnemonic and recall the list

6-8, 9-12, 3-5Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who must memorize lists (steps of a process, parts of a system, order of events) and lose items even after study. Distinct from using a taught mnemonic (ef-wm-018): here the student makes their own. Present levels, not grade, decide the list length.

Baseline
Give a list and the usual study time without teaching the strategy; check recall the next day. Then repeat with the strategy. Keep list length and difficulty the same for comparison.
Tips
Let the student pick the mnemonic type; personal ones stick best. The next-day recall is the score, written on a quick slip. Use real lists from current classes so the goal helps right away.
Limits
Mnemonics help with lists, not with explaining concepts. Next-day recall depends on attendance; skip absent days.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ef-ss-034.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a content list of 5 to 8 items to memorize for a quiz, the student will create an acronym, sentence, or picture mnemonic for the list and use it to write the list from memory the next day independently with at least 90% accuracy on list items recalled in order the day after study, on 3 of 4 consecutive lists, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 50% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Study & Test-Taking Skills.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Executive Function - Study & Test-Taking Skills
Baseline
50% accuracy.
Annual goal401 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a content list of 5 to 8 items to memorize for a quiz, the student will create an acronym, sentence, or picture mnemonic for the list and use it to write the list from memory the next day independently with at least 90% accuracy on list items recalled in order the day after study, on 3 of 4 consecutive lists, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a content list of 5 to 8 items to memorize for a quiz
Behavior
The student will create an acronym, sentence, or picture mnemonic for the list and use it to write the list from memory the next day independently
Criteria
With at least 90% accuracy on list items recalled in order the day after study, on 3 of 4 consecutive lists
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.