Skip to content

Judge whether an online source is reliable

9-12, 6-8Task-analysis stepsTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For high school students who use the first search result for research without checking who made it or why. Present levels decide the site complexity.

Baseline
Observe one full check. Mark each step independent, prompted, or skipped. The step of searching about the publisher is usually new.
Tips
Pairs with the fact-checking template. Use school-approved sites.
Limits
Reliability is not always clear-cut; accept reasoned judgments.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID rd-comp-093.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Number of routine steps performed independently.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Task-analysis steps

Write each step so an observer can mark it done or not done.

Criterion wording

Data collection

A routine is broken into ordered steps; each step is recorded as independent, supported, or not completed.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given a website or article found during a research task, the student will complete the 6-step source check and state whether the source is reliable for the task, performing all 6 steps independently, across 3 consecutive research tasks, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 2 of 6 steps independently.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Task-analysis steps fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Task-analysis checklist gives task-analysis steps data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Reading Comprehension.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Reading - Reading Comprehension
Baseline
2 of 6 steps independently.
Annual goal335 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given a website or article found during a research task, the student will complete the 6-step source check and state whether the source is reliable for the task, performing all 6 steps independently, across 3 consecutive research tasks, as measured by a task-analysis checklist collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given a website or article found during a research task
Behavior
The student will complete the 6-step source check and state whether the source is reliable for the task
Criteria
Performing all 6 steps independently, across 3 consecutive research tasks
Evaluation method
A task-analysis checklist
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Task-analysis checklist. Marks each step in each session.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.