Decide what personal information is safe online
When to use this goal
For students who post or send their full name, school, phone number, where they live, or location to people they do not know. Present levels decide fit. The rule: private details go only to people in your close circles, and never to someone you have only met online.
- Baseline
- Use 12 realistic requests from apps and games the student uses. Score each decision and reason. Note what the student already shares.
- Tips
- Use the student's real platforms with permission. Teach that it is never too late to tell a trusted adult about something already shared. Coordinate with digital-literacy goals for privacy settings.
- Limits
- Sorting samples does not show what the student does online. The IEP goal does not replace family supervision or platform safety tools.
Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID se-rb-009.
Sign in to add this goal to a student.
Goal
By the annual IEP review date, given 12 sample messages, profiles, or game chats asking for different kinds of information, from known friends and from people met only online, the student will say whether the information is safe to share with that person and give a reason independently with 100% accuracy on online information requests, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Baseline: 50% accuracy.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check11 of 11 met
Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.
Met: Condition. Stated.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives percent accuracy data.
Met: Review timeframe. Stated.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Relationships, Boundaries & Personal Safety.
Met: Level of support. Defined.
Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.
Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.
Paste into your IEP system
Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.
- Area of need
- Social-Emotional & Communication - Relationships, Boundaries & Personal Safety
- Baseline
- 50% accuracy.
- Annual goal439 characters
- By the annual IEP review date, given 12 sample messages, profiles, or game chats asking for different kinds of information, from known friends and from people met only online, the student will say whether the information is safe to share with that person and give a reason independently with 100% accuracy on online information requests, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
- Timeframe
- By the annual IEP review date
- Condition
- Given 12 sample messages, profiles, or game chats asking for different kinds of information, from known friends and from people met only online
- Behavior
- The student will say whether the information is safe to share with that person and give a reason independently
- Criteria
- With 100% accuracy on online information requests, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Evaluation method
- Opportunity-by-opportunity data
- Schedule
- Weekly
Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.
Matching data sheet
Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.
Accuracy tracker
Percent accuracy- Student label:
- Target:
- with 100% accuracy on online information requests
- Mastery rule:
- in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Opportunity (trial) recording
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, given 12 sample messages, profiles, or game chats asking for different kinds of information, from known friends and from people met only online, the student will say whether the information is safe to share with that person and give a reason independently with 100% accuracy on online information requests, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
| Date | Task / materials | # correct | # attempted | % accuracycorrect ÷ attempted × 100 | Support levele.g., independent, 1 verbal prompt | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Score only items the student attempted unless the goal defines a fixed set of items. Use the same denominator every session.
- Percent = numerator ÷ denominator × 100. Round to one decimal place.
- Record the support actually provided, even if the goal is independent performance.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.