Skip to content

Explain ways to pay for college or training

9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students planning on college or training who mix up grants, loans, scholarships and work-study, or who assume college is out of reach. Present levels in reading and money concepts decide whether scenarios are read aloud.

Baseline
Give 8 to 10 items before teaching. Note whether the student treats loans as free money; that misunderstanding has the largest cost later.
Tips
Use sample offer letters from local colleges. Vocational rehabilitation may help pay for training for eligible students; the transition coordinator can explain options. Staff give general information, not financial advice.
Limits
Knowing terms does not mean the student and family can compare real offers; that needs a family conversation.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID tn-pse-028.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given short scenarios about students paying for college or training and a list of aid types, the student will identify the type of aid in each scenario and whether it must be paid back independently with at least 85% accuracy on aid scenarios and offer letter questions, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly during the college finance unit.

Baseline: 35% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Postsecondary Education Readiness.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Transition & Postsecondary Skills - Postsecondary Education Readiness
Baseline
35% accuracy.
Annual goal424 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given short scenarios about students paying for college or training and a list of aid types, the student will identify the type of aid in each scenario and whether it must be paid back independently with at least 85% accuracy on aid scenarios and offer letter questions, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly during the college finance unit.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given short scenarios about students paying for college or training and a list of aid types
Behavior
The student will identify the type of aid in each scenario and whether it must be paid back independently
Criteria
With at least 85% accuracy on aid scenarios and offer letter questions, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly during the college finance unit

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.