Make a written plan before drafting
Live goal preview
By the annual IEP review date, before drafting a writing assignment that calls for a paragraph or longer, the student will complete a written or typed plan listing the topic, at least three ideas, and a closing idea independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weeks of data, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Baseline: 1 of 5 opportunities.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check10 of 10 met
All structural checks are met.
Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.
Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording can produce opportunities data.
Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Written Expression.
Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.
What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.
About this template
- Level guidance
- Fits students who begin drafting without a plan and then stall, repeat ideas, or stop after a sentence or two. Use present levels and observation of the student's writing process, not grade, to decide whether planning is the right target or whether sentence-level skills need attention first.
- Baseline considerations
- For one to two weeks, record each writing assignment of a paragraph or longer as an opportunity and note whether a plan with the required parts existed before the first draft sentence. Note the support level that was in place (template provided, reminder given) so the baseline matches the support named in the goal.
- Usage notes
- Define what counts as a complete plan (topic, at least three ideas, a closing idea) and accept lists, webs, typed notes, or voice-recorded notes that are then typed if the student uses those tools. Count only assignments where planning was expected. Pair with a product goal so the plan is connected to what the student writes.
- Known limitations
- A complete plan does not guarantee a well-organized draft; this goal measures strategy use, not writing quality. Opportunities vary week to week, so collect a fixed number per week where possible. Plans made with heavy adult input should be recorded as prompted, not independent.
- Source
- Original IEP Atlas draft (AI-assisted) based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. Template ID
wr-exp-003.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.
Matching data sheet
Opportunity tracker. Your goal counts opportunities, so the sheet has one box per opportunity in each session.
Opportunity tracker
Opportunities- Student label:
- Target:
- in at least 4 of 5 opportunities
- Mastery rule:
- across 3 consecutive weeks of data
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Opportunity (trial) recording
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, before drafting a writing assignment that calls for a paragraph or longer, the student will complete a written or typed plan listing the topic, at least three ideas, and a closing idea independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weeks of data, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred
| Date | Activity / context | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | # + (of 5) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Record up to 5 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
- Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
- Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.