Edit a passage for capitalization and punctuation
Live goal preview
By the annual IEP review date, given a short passage containing 15 errors in capitalization (sentence beginnings, proper nouns, and the pronoun I) and end punctuation, the student will edit the passage by marking and correcting each capitalization and punctuation error independently with at least 85% accuracy on embedded capitalization and punctuation errors, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Baseline: 45% accuracy.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check10 of 10 met
All structural checks are met.
Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.
Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis can produce percent accuracy data.
Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Sentence Construction.
Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.
What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.
About this template
- Level guidance
- Fits students whose writing frequently omits capital letters and end punctuation, or who cannot find these errors when proofreading. Present levels and error patterns in the student's own work, not grade, determine which conventions to include.
- Baseline considerations
- Give two or three unpracticed passages, each with the same number and types of embedded errors. The denominator is the fixed set of 15 errors in the passage. Separately tally any new errors the student introduces, such as capitalizing a common noun mid-sentence.
- Usage notes
- Build passages at or below the student's independent reading level so reading does not limit editing. Keep error types in the same proportions across probes. Pair with a goal that checks conventions in the student's own writing so the skill transfers.
- Known limitations
- Finding errors in a prepared passage is easier than avoiding them while composing. The percentage does not reflect over-corrections unless they are tracked separately.
- Source
- Original IEP Atlas draft (AI-assisted) based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. Template ID
wr-sen-004.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.
Matching data sheet
Accuracy tracker. Your goal is scored as percent correct, so the sheet records number correct and number attempted.
Accuracy tracker
Percent accuracy- Student label:
- Target:
- with at least 85% accuracy on embedded capitalization and punctuation errors
- Mastery rule:
- in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Work-sample analysis
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, given a short passage containing 15 errors in capitalization (sentence beginnings, proper nouns, and the pronoun I) and end punctuation, the student will edit the passage by marking and correcting each capitalization and punctuation error independently with at least 85% accuracy on embedded capitalization and punctuation errors, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
| Date | Task / materials | # correct | # attempted | % accuracycorrect ÷ attempted × 100 | Support levele.g., independent, 1 verbal prompt | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Score only items the student attempted unless the goal defines a fixed set of items. Use the same denominator every session.
- Percent = numerator ÷ denominator × 100. Round to one decimal place.
- Record the support actually provided, even if the goal is independent performance.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.