Skip to content
IEP Atlas
Menu

Sentence Construction IEP goals

Sentence construction goals target the building block of all writing: a complete, readable sentence with correct capitals and end marks, and later sentences that combine and expand ideas. Many of these skills can be measured on short, structured tasks, but the real test is whether they show up in the student's own writing. A good plan often pairs one controlled task with one goal measured in writing samples.

6 templates · Not yet educator-reviewed · How we write and review goals

Sample sentence construction goals

Numbers are illustrative. Set targets from the student's own baseline data.

  • Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5Opportunities

    Write a complete simple sentence from a picture or oral prompt

    Writing a complete simple sentence

    By the annual IEP review date, given a picture or oral prompt during a structured writing activity, the student will write a complete sentence with a subject and a verb that begins with a capital letter and ends with end punctuation independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection days, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Combine short sentences into compound and complex sentences

    Sentence combining

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 pairs of short related sentences, the student will combine each pair into one grammatically complete compound or complex sentence that keeps the meaning of both sentences independently with at least 80% accuracy on sentence-combining items, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize this goalAccuracy tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities

    Use compound and complex sentences in paragraph writing

    Using compound and complex sentences in own writing

    By the annual IEP review date, when writing a paragraph-length response during language arts or content-area classes, the student will include at least two correctly punctuated compound or complex sentences in the response independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weeks of writing samples, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.

    Customize this goalOpportunity tracker
  • Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Edit a passage for capitalization and punctuation

    Capitalization and end punctuation

    By the annual IEP review date, given a short passage containing 15 errors in capitalization (sentence beginnings, proper nouns, and the pronoun I) and end punctuation, the student will edit the passage by marking and correcting each capitalization and punctuation error independently with at least 85% accuracy on embedded capitalization and punctuation errors, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize this goalAccuracy tracker
  • Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5Percent accuracy

    Expand kernel sentences with when, where, why, or how details

    Sentence expansion

    By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short kernel sentences of three to four words each, the student will expand each sentence by adding at least two details that tell when, where, why, or how while keeping it a complete sentence independently with at least 80% accuracy on kernel sentences, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

    Customize this goalAccuracy tracker
  • Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Percent accuracy

    Write complete sentences without run-ons or fragments in own writing

    Avoiding run-ons and fragments in extended writing

    By the annual IEP review date, in independent writing samples of at least eight sentences, the student will write complete sentences without run-ons or fragments independently with at least 90% accuracy on sentences written, across 3 consecutive biweekly writing samples, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

    Customize this goalAccuracy tracker

Writing · Sentence Construction

Customize a goal

Student reference

Use a generic label rather than a student's name. Review goals within your school's approved IEP system.

Current baseline

Sample numbers are illustrative. Set the baseline and target from the student's own assessment data and team judgment.

Condition

Setting, materials, or situation, such as a passage level or a work period.

Observable behavior

Something an adult can see, count, or time. Avoid “understand,” “improve,” or “know.”

Level of support

Say exactly what support counts, such as “with one verbal prompt.” Leave “independently” if none.

Criterion

Number of opportunities in which the behavior is demonstrated, out of a fixed number.

Measurement method

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Mastery rule
Timeframe and monitoring

You can type a date, such as “By May 15, 2027”.

Match the schedule to the skill. Fluency often uses weekly probes. Writing rubrics may be scored every few weeks.

Live goal preview

By the annual IEP review date, given a picture or oral prompt during a structured writing activity, the student will write a complete sentence with a subject and a verb that begins with a capital letter and ends with end punctuation independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection days, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

Baseline: 1 of 5 opportunities.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method
Add objectivesMatching data sheet

Measurability check10 of 10 met

All structural checks are met.

  • Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording can produce opportunities data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Sentence Construction.

  • Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.

What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.

Build objectives by

Matching data sheet

Opportunity tracker. Your goal counts opportunities, so the sheet has one box per opportunity in each session.

Opportunity tracker

Opportunities
Student label:
 
Target:
in at least 4 of 5 opportunities
Mastery rule:
across 3 consecutive data collection days
Collection schedule:
twice weekly
Method:
Opportunity (trial) recording
Data collector:
 

Goal: By the annual IEP review date, given a picture or oral prompt during a structured writing activity, the student will write a complete sentence with a subject and a verb that begins with a capital letter and ends with end punctuation independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection days, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred

Opportunity tracker
DateActivity / context12345# + (of 5)Notes

Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.

  • Record up to 5 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
  • Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
  • Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.

Prefer more room? Open this template in the full builder.

skill_page

What sentence construction involves

  • Writing a complete sentence with a subject and a verb
  • Using capital letters and end punctuation correctly
  • Combining short sentences into compound and complex sentences
  • Expanding sentences with details that tell when, where, why, or how
  • Recognizing and fixing run-ons and fragments

Baseline and measurement considerations

  • For structured tasks (combining or expanding a fixed set of sentences, editing a passage with a set number of errors), the condition defines the item set and the denominator.
  • For the student's own writing, decide in advance how sentences are segmented and write the rule on the data sheet.
  • Use unpracticed items on each probe so results show skill rather than memory of the items.
  • Track over-corrections and new errors separately when scoring editing tasks.

Progress-monitoring methods used in these templates

  • Opportunity (trial) recording: Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Work-sample analysis: Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

Matching data sheets

Each template links to a blank sheet built for its measure. You can also download these sheets on their own:

  • Opportunity tracker: Records each opportunity as independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.
  • Accuracy tracker: Number correct out of number attempted, with percent accuracy and support level.

Common mistakes when writing sentence construction goals

  • Writing "will use correct grammar" without saying which structures are being measured.
  • Measuring only worksheet tasks and assuming the skill transfers to the student's own writing.
  • Using accuracy on own writing without stating what counts as a sentence or a correct one.
  • Penalizing spelling in a sentence-structure goal, which hides growth in the targeted skill.

Frequently asked questions

Should a sentence goal count spelling errors?

Usually not. If the goal targets sentence structure, score structure and the conventions named in the goal, and accept readable invented spelling. Address spelling in a separate goal so each one shows its own progress.

What is the difference between sentence combining and sentence expansion?

Sentence combining joins two or more short sentences into one, which builds compound and complex sentences. Sentence expansion adds details to a single short sentence. Both build longer, more varied sentences and can be measured as accuracy on a fixed set of items.

How can I show that sentence skills carry over to real writing?

Add a goal or objective measured in writing samples, such as the percent of complete sentences or the number of samples that include compound or complex sentences. Score samples from regular class assignments with the same rule each time.

References

IEP Atlas is a drafting aid. Every goal is a starting point that needs to be individualized from assessment data and reviewed by the IEP team. It does not determine compliance or appropriateness for any student.