Skip to content

Write a sentence that states what a graph or table shows

3-5, 6-8, 9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who can read a bar graph or table but write a number or a fragment when asked what it shows, in math, science, and social studies. Present levels should show the student can read the display; the goal targets the sentence.

Baseline
Give two probes of five displays. A sentence is correct when it is complete, uses a label or number from the display, and states something true about the data. Separate reading errors (wrong value) from writing errors (fragment, no reference to the data).
Tips
Use displays from the student's actual lessons so the sentences double as class work. Comparison sentences (more than, fewer than, the most) are the most useful set to teach. The frame is a strong support; fade it if the goal is independent.
Limits
Reading the display is a math skill and inaccurate sentences may reflect that. Displays vary in complexity. Five items per probe give coarse percentages.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID wr-sen-027.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given five graphs or tables from a current math or science lesson, the student will write one complete sentence for each display that states a true fact or comparison shown by the data, using numbers or labels from the display independently with at least 80% accuracy on data displays, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.

Baseline: 20% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check11 of 11 met
  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Sentence Construction.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Writing - Sentence Construction
Baseline
20% accuracy.
Annual goal407 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given five graphs or tables from a current math or science lesson, the student will write one complete sentence for each display that states a true fact or comparison shown by the data, using numbers or labels from the display independently with at least 80% accuracy on data displays, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected weekly.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given five graphs or tables from a current math or science lesson
Behavior
The student will write one complete sentence for each display that states a true fact or comparison shown by the data, using numbers or labels from the display independently
Criteria
With at least 80% accuracy on data displays, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Weekly

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.