Post a respectful discussion board reply
When to use this goal
For students whose online class posts are one word (agree), off topic, or harsh in a way they would not be in person. Present levels in written expression or speech-to-text decide fit.
- Baseline
- Review the student's last five replies on the class board. Count a reply only when all three parts are present. Note whether disrespect is the issue or just very short replies.
- Tips
- Online tone is a digital citizenship skill and a job skill. Reply starters work well for students who freeze at a blank box. Students can draft by voice.
- Limits
- Respectful wording takes judgment; agree on examples. The goal does not score the quality of the student's idea.
Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID ca-dig-021.
Sign in to add this goal to a student.
Goal
By the annual IEP review date, when the class discussion board asks students to reply to a classmate's post, the student will write a reply that names the classmate's point, adds their own idea or question, and uses respectful wording independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weeks of data, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Baseline: 1 of 5 opportunities.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check11 of 11 met
Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.
Met: Condition. Stated.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities fits this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives opportunities data.
Met: Review timeframe. Stated.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Digital Literacy & Online Safety.
Met: Level of support. Defined.
Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.
Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.
Paste into your IEP system
Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.
- Area of need
- Science, Social Studies & Digital Literacy - Digital Literacy & Online Safety
- Baseline
- 1 of 5 opportunities.
- Annual goal383 characters
- By the annual IEP review date, when the class discussion board asks students to reply to a classmate's post, the student will write a reply that names the classmate's point, adds their own idea or question, and uses respectful wording independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weeks of data, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
- Timeframe
- By the annual IEP review date
- Condition
- When the class discussion board asks students to reply to a classmate's post
- Behavior
- The student will write a reply that names the classmate's point, adds their own idea or question, and uses respectful wording independently
- Criteria
- In at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weeks of data
- Evaluation method
- Opportunity-by-opportunity data
- Schedule
- Weekly
Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.
Matching data sheet
Opportunity tracker. One box per opportunity in each session.
Opportunity tracker
Opportunities- Student label:
- Target:
- in at least 4 of 5 opportunities
- Mastery rule:
- across 3 consecutive weeks of data
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Opportunity (trial) recording
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, when the class discussion board asks students to reply to a classmate's post, the student will write a reply that names the classmate's point, adds their own idea or question, and uses respectful wording independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weeks of data, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred
| Date | Activity / context | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | # + (of 5) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Record up to 5 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
- Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
- Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.