Recognize warning signs of grooming
When to use this goal
For older students who may not see warning signs when an adult or older person gives gifts, asks for secrets, isolates them, or asks for photos. Present levels decide fit. Scenarios stay non-graphic.
- Baseline
- Use 10 non-graphic scenarios with a mix of safe and unsafe adults. Let the student skip any. Score judgment, sign, and who to tell.
- Tips
- Teach that it is never the young person's fault. Follow mandated reporting for any disclosure. Use the district's approved prevention program alongside this goal.
- Limits
- Scenario answers do not guarantee recognition in real life. The IEP goal never replaces mandated reporting or a safety plan.
Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID se-rb-029.
Sign in to add this goal to a student.
Goal
By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short non-graphic scenarios of adults or older people interacting with a teen, some showing warning signs, the student will say whether each scenario shows a warning sign, name the sign, and name who to tell independently with 100% accuracy on warning sign scenarios, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
Baseline: 40% accuracy.
- Condition
- Observable behavior
- Criterion
- Measurement method
Measurability check11 of 11 met
Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.
Met: Condition. Stated.
Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.
Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.
Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.
Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording gives percent accuracy data.
Met: Review timeframe. Stated.
Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.
Met: Aligned with area of need. Still about Relationships, Boundaries & Personal Safety.
Met: Level of support. Defined.
Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.
Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.
Short-term objectives (optional)
When are objectives required?Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.
Paste into your IEP system
Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.
- Area of need
- Social-Emotional & Communication - Relationships, Boundaries & Personal Safety
- Baseline
- 40% accuracy.
- Annual goal409 characters
- By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short non-graphic scenarios of adults or older people interacting with a teen, some showing warning signs, the student will say whether each scenario shows a warning sign, name the sign, and name who to tell independently with 100% accuracy on warning sign scenarios, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
- Timeframe
- By the annual IEP review date
- Condition
- Given 10 short non-graphic scenarios of adults or older people interacting with a teen, some showing warning signs
- Behavior
- The student will say whether each scenario shows a warning sign, name the sign, and name who to tell independently
- Criteria
- With 100% accuracy on warning sign scenarios, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Evaluation method
- Opportunity-by-opportunity data
- Schedule
- Weekly
Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.
Matching data sheet
Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.
Accuracy tracker
Percent accuracy- Student label:
- Target:
- with 100% accuracy on warning sign scenarios
- Mastery rule:
- in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes
- Collection schedule:
- weekly
- Method:
- Opportunity (trial) recording
- Data collector:
Goal: By the annual IEP review date, given 10 short non-graphic scenarios of adults or older people interacting with a teen, some showing warning signs, the student will say whether each scenario shows a warning sign, name the sign, and name who to tell independently with 100% accuracy on warning sign scenarios, in 3 of 4 consecutive weekly probes, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly.
| Date | Task / materials | # correct | # attempted | % accuracycorrect ÷ attempted × 100 | Support levele.g., independent, 1 verbal prompt | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.
- Score only items the student attempted unless the goal defines a fixed set of items. Use the same denominator every session.
- Percent = numerator ÷ denominator × 100. Round to one decimal place.
- Record the support actually provided, even if the goal is independent performance.
The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.