Skip to content

Match job benefits to what they cover

6-8, 9-12Percent accuracyTemplateReview and individualize before use. How templates are made
When to use this goal

For students who hear words like health insurance, paid time off and retirement plan in job talks but cannot say what they mean. Vocabulary present levels, not grade, decide fit; pair each term with a picture or a short example.

Baseline
Ask the student to explain each term before any teaching and record which ones they already describe. Note terms they confuse with each other, such as sick leave and paid time off.
Tips
Pair with a lesson on comparing jobs by more than the hourly wage. Keep examples general and avoid quoting real plan costs. For older students, move to the benefits section of a real posting they are interested in.
Limits
Benefit details differ by employer and change often, so the goal checks the meaning of terms, not the rules of any plan. It does not measure whether the student chooses or enrolls in benefits.

Original IEP Atlas template based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. ID tn-ef-003.

Sign in to add this goal to a student.

Student

How the goal refers to the student

Skill

What the student will do

Something an adult can see, count or time.

Condition

When or under what conditions

Support

Support allowed

Criterion

Percent of attempted items answered correctly.

Sample numbers. Replace them with the student's data.

Criterion wording

Data collection

Scoring completed student work (permanent products) against a defined answer key or checklist.

How often data are collected
Mastery rule

How many measurements must meet the criterion.

Timeframe

Timeframe

Goal

By the annual IEP review date, given 8 benefit terms and 8 short life situations (a doctor visit, a family trip, getting older), the student will match each benefit to the situation it helps with and say one way it helps independently with at least 75% accuracy on benefit matches, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.

Baseline: 25% accuracy.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method

ObjectivesCopy by fieldData sheet

Measurability check10 of 11 met · 1 to review
  • Review: Aligned with area of need. The wording no longer mentions Employment Foundations. Check it still matches the need in present levels.

  • Met: Observable behavior. Stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. Stated.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Percent accuracy fits this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. Number and unit stated.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Both stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Work-sample analysis gives percent accuracy data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. Stated.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Same unit, change in the right direction.

  • Met: Level of support. Defined.

  • Met: Blanks filled in. Nothing left to fill in.

Checks structure and wording only. Whether the goal fits the student is the team's call.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Required for students on alternate assessments (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)); some states require them for everyone.

Build objectives by

Paste into your IEP system

Most district systems have a separate box for each part of a goal. Copy them one at a time, or all at once as labeled text.

Area of need
Transition & Postsecondary Skills - Employment Foundations
Baseline
25% accuracy.
Annual goal383 characters
By the annual IEP review date, given 8 benefit terms and 8 short life situations (a doctor visit, a family trip, getting older), the student will match each benefit to the situation it helps with and say one way it helps independently with at least 75% accuracy on benefit matches, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes, as measured by work-sample analysis collected every two weeks.
Timeframe
By the annual IEP review date
Condition
Given 8 benefit terms and 8 short life situations (a doctor visit, a family trip, getting older)
Behavior
The student will match each benefit to the situation it helps with and say one way it helps independently
Criteria
With at least 75% accuracy on benefit matches, in 3 of 4 consecutive biweekly probes
Evaluation method
Work-sample analysis
Schedule
Every two weeks

Copied as plain text, with straight quotes and plain dashes.

Matching data sheet

Accuracy tracker. Records number correct and number attempted.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets, with formulas. Sheets print blank; no student data is stored.