Behavior goals without "compliance"
By the IEP Atlas editorial teamLast updated
Short answer
A behavior goal without compliance names a skill the student will use, not a direction they will obey. Instead of "will comply with teacher directions 80% of the time," write a goal for asking for a break, starting work with a plan, or negotiating a change. Each goal still needs a condition, a baseline, a criterion and a measurement method.
"Will comply with adult directions in 80% of opportunities" is one of the most common behavior goals in IEPs. It is also one of the least useful. It does not say what skill the student is missing, it treats every direction as equal, and it measures obedience rather than growth. A student who meets it may have learned nothing they can use when the adult leaves.
The alternative is a goal built from the function of the behavior. If a student refuses work to escape tasks that feel too hard, the missing skill is asking for help or a break, or starting with a plan. The goals below target those skills. They are fictional examples with illustrative baselines, not benchmarks. For how the function shapes the plan, see the FBA and BIP guide.
Why "compliance" goals fall short
- No skill named. "Comply" describes the adult's request being met, not what the student can now do.
- Function ignored. A student who refuses to escape and a student who refuses for attention get the same goal.
- Safety and learning mixed together. "Put down the scissors" and "take out your planner" count the same.
- Teaches the wrong lesson for some students. For students who need to learn to say no safely, such as in body-safety situations, blanket obedience is not the target.
There are times when following a specific direction is the right goal, such as stopping at a curb when an adult says "stop." Name that direction and its reason. The following adult directions page has goals scoped that way.
Decision table: from student profile to goal area
| What you see | Likely function | Goal area | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refuses or leaves during hard tasks | Escape | Requesting help or a break | Opportunities |
| Melts down when upset, slow to recover | Often escape or sensory | Coping and recovery | Duration or latency |
| Takes 10 minutes to start work | Escape or skill gap | Starting work | Latency |
| Argues or shuts down at changes | Escape or item access | Flexibility and transitions | Opportunities or latency |
| Argues about rules or tasks | Escape or control | Negotiating and self-advocacy | Opportunities |
| Conflicts with peers escalate | Attention or item access | Social problem solving | Frequency or opportunities |
Requesting help or a break
| # | Goal | Baseline | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | During independent math, when stuck for 1 minute or more, Leo will ask for help using words or a help card in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 consecutive weeks. | 0 of 6 observed opportunities | Opportunity data, 3 days a week |
| 2 | During writing tasks, Maya will request a 2-minute break with her break card and return to the task within 3 minutes in 8 of 10 opportunities. | 1 of 10 | Opportunity data, daily |
| 3 | In science labs, Jordan will ask a peer or adult to clarify a direction before starting, in 75% of new tasks over 4 weeks. | 2 of 12 new tasks | Opportunity data, weekly |
| 4 | Given a nonpreferred task, Ella will use her AAC device to say "I need help" or "break, please" within 30 seconds of the first sign of frustration in 4 of 5 opportunities. | 0 of 8 | Opportunity data, daily |
Weak: "Maya will comply with writing assignments 80% of the time." Measurable: goal 2 above. It names the skill (requesting a break), the condition (writing tasks), the return to work, and a denominator.
Coping and recovery
| # | Goal | Baseline | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | When upset, as shown by raised voice or clenched fists, Sam will use one of three coping strategies from his card within 2 minutes in 7 of 10 observed episodes. | 1 of 10 episodes | Episode log with opportunity data |
| 6 | After a frustrating event, Ava will return to the class activity within 5 minutes, reduced from a median of 22 minutes, across 4 consecutive weeks. | Median 22 minutes | Duration recording per episode |
| 7 | When told a preferred activity is over, Kai will rate his feelings on a 1 to 5 scale and choose a calming strategy, without adult prompts, in 4 of 5 opportunities. | Needs full prompting in 5 of 5 | Opportunity data with prompt level |
| 8 | During the day, Lucia will go to the calm space and use a strategy before her rating reaches 4 on her scale, on 3 of 4 days per week for 4 weeks. | 0 days per week | Daily self-rating card checked by teacher |
Weak: "Sam will remain calm and follow directions when upset." Measurable: goal 5. The coping skill, the sign that starts the clock, and the time limit are all stated. More coping goals are in coping skills goals for the IEP.
Starting work
| # | Goal | Baseline | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | After whole-class directions for independent work, Noah will write his name and complete the first item within 2 minutes on 4 of 5 days for 3 weeks. | Median latency 9 minutes | Latency recording |
| 10 | Given a multi-step assignment, Priya will break it into 3 or more steps on a planning card before starting, on 80% of assignments over a grading period. | 0 of 10 assignments | Permanent product review |
| 11 | During independent reading, Theo will choose a book and begin reading within 90 seconds in 9 of 10 sessions. | Median latency 6 minutes | Latency recording |
| 12 | With a visual checklist, Grace will start each of 3 morning tasks without a verbal prompt on 4 of 5 days. | 1 of 3 tasks without prompts | Task checklist with prompt level |
Weak: "Noah will comply with directions to begin work." Measurable: goal 9 names what "starting" looks like and a time limit taken from the baseline. See task initiation goals for more.
Flexibility and transitions
| # | Goal | Baseline | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | When a schedule change is shown on his visual schedule, Eli will say or sign "okay, change" and move to the new activity within 1 minute in 4 of 5 changes. | 1 of 5 changes | Opportunity data |
| 14 | When a game does not go her way, Rosa will use a flexible-thinking phrase such as "maybe next time" and keep playing, in 3 of 4 observed games. | 0 of 6 games | Opportunity data at recess |
| 15 | When asked to stop a preferred activity, Ben will set his own 2-minute timer and transition when it ends in 8 of 10 opportunities. | Median latency 7 minutes | Latency recording |
| 16 | Given an unexpected change in routine, Zoe will identify one thing that stays the same and one choice she has, with no more than 1 prompt, in 4 of 5 opportunities. | Needs 3 or more prompts | Opportunity data with prompt count |
Weak: "Eli will comply with transitions without behavior." Measurable: goal 13. The cognitive flexibility goals guide has more in this area.
Negotiating and self-advocacy
| # | Goal | Baseline | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | When he disagrees with a task, Marcus will make a respectful counteroffer, such as "Can I do half now and half later?", in 4 of 5 observed disagreements. | 0 of 7 | Opportunity data |
| 18 | When an assignment is too hard, Aisha will name the specific part that is hard and ask for one support from her accommodation list in 3 of 4 opportunities. | 0 of 4 | Opportunity data |
| 19 | In a scheduled weekly check-in, Diego will state one goal he met and one thing that would help him next week, on 4 of 5 check-ins. | 1 of 5 | Check-in notes |
| 20 | When she wants to decline a request, Mia will use a calm "no, thank you" or "not right now" and offer an alternative in 75% of opportunities over 4 weeks. | Shouts or leaves in 9 of 10 | Opportunity data |
Weak: "Marcus will not argue with adults." Measurable: goal 17 teaches the skill arguing was trying to do. The self-advocacy goals examples cover more.
Social problem solving
| # | Goal | Baseline | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | During group work, when a peer takes his materials, Owen will ask for them back using words, and get an adult if needed, in 4 of 5 conflicts. | Grabs back in 6 of 6 | Opportunity data |
| 22 | After a peer conflict, Lily will name the problem, two possible solutions and the one she will try, with no more than 1 prompt, in 3 of 4 conflicts. | Needs full prompting | Problem-solving form |
| 23 | During recess, Jamal will join a peer game by asking "Can I play?" or waiting for a turn, reducing pushing into games from 4 per week to 0 or 1 per week across 3 weeks. | 4 pushes per week | Frequency recording |
| 24 | When teased, Ruby will use a planned response (walk away, use a short phrase, or report) in 4 of 5 observed incidents. | 1 of 5 | Incident log with opportunity data |
Weak: "Owen will get along with peers." Measurable: goal 21. For a wider set, see peer interaction goals.
How to measure these goals
Most goals above use opportunity data: the number of times the student used the skill out of the times the chance came up. That makes the denominator visible and stops a quiet day from looking like success. Track it on the opportunity data sheet.
Use latency for starting and transition goals, and duration for recovery. Pair each skill goal with a count of the problem behavior, so the team can see both lines move. The guide to choosing a behavior data method matches methods to behaviors, and progress monitoring for behavior goals covers graphing.
Short-term objectives for skill-based goals
Break a skill goal down by prompt level or by setting. For goal 2:
- With a verbal prompt at the first sign of frustration, Maya will hand over her break card in 4 of 5 opportunities.
- With a gesture prompt, she will use the card in 4 of 5 opportunities.
- Without prompts, she will use the card and return within 3 minutes in 8 of 10 opportunities.
Adapting by grade
| Grade band | What changes | Example adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-K to 2 | Picture cards, adult modeling, short time limits | Break card with a picture; 1-minute latency |
| Grades 3 to 5 | Scripts, self-rating scales, simple plans | Coping card with 3 choices; feelings scale |
| Middle school | Discreet signals, negotiation scripts, self-monitoring | Private hand signal; counteroffer phrases |
| High school | Self-advocacy, planning, links to transition goals | Email to teacher asking for an accommodation |
The classroom expectations goals and replacement behavior goals pages have grade-banded templates. Paste your draft into the goal checker to catch missing parts. If you manage many behavior goals across a caseload, the caseload tracker keeps review dates in one place.
When a student's behavior impedes learning, the IEP team must consider positive behavioral interventions and supports.[1] The What Works Clearinghouse practice guide on classroom behavior recommends teaching and reinforcing new skills to replace problem behavior.[2]
Frequently asked questions
Is it ever okay to write a compliance goal?
For a specific, safety-related direction, yes, as long as the goal names the direction and why it matters, such as stopping at a curb when told. Avoid goals that target following any adult direction, because they do not name a skill.
How do I measure a skill-based behavior goal?
Most use opportunity data: how many times the student used the skill out of the chances to use it. Starting and transition goals use latency, and recovery goals use duration. Pair the skill goal with a count of the problem behavior.
What if the IEP team wants a goal to reduce the problem behavior?
Pair it with a skill goal. A reduction goal alone tells the student what to stop, not what to do instead. Many teams write the skill as the goal and track the problem behavior as supporting data.
Use it in IEP Atlas
- Behavior IEP goals
- Classroom expectations goals
- Replacement behavior goals
- Opportunity data sheet
- Caseload tracker
- IEP goal checker
Related guides
- FBA and BIP: a practical guide for IEP teams
- Behavior IEP goal examples with data methods
- Replacement behavior examples by function
- Writing a behavior goal from an FBA
- Choosing a behavior data method
Sources
- 34 CFR §300.324: Development, review, and revision of IEP, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
- Reducing Behavior Problems in the Elementary School Classroom, What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences
Written and checked by the IEP Atlas editorial team under our editorial policy. This guide describes general practice and federal rules. It is not legal advice; your state may add requirements, and the IEP team makes the decisions for each student.