Skip to content
IEP Atlas
Menu

State the problem using an I-message

Unreviewed draft3-5, 6-8Opportunities
Student reference

Use a generic label rather than a student's name. Review goals within your school's approved IEP system.

Current baseline

Sample numbers are illustrative. Set the baseline and target from the student's own assessment data and team judgment.

Condition

Setting, materials, or situation, such as a passage level or a work period.

Observable behavior

Something an adult can see, count, or time. Avoid “understand,” “improve,” or “know.”

Level of support

Say exactly what support counts, such as “with one verbal prompt.” Leave “independently” if none.

Criterion

Number of opportunities in which the behavior is demonstrated, out of a fixed number.

Measurement method

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Mastery rule
Timeframe and monitoring

You can type a date, such as “By May 15, 2027”.

Match the schedule to the skill. Fluency often uses weekly probes. Writing rubrics may be scored every few weeks.

Live goal preview

By the annual IEP review date, when a peer does something the student objects to (e.g., takes their materials, cuts in line, interrupts), the student will state the problem using an I-message that names the situation and what they want (e.g., "I don't like it when you take my pencil. Please ask first.") independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weekly data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly through role-play probes and observed conflicts.

Baseline: 0 of 5 opportunities.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method
Add objectivesMatching data sheet

Measurability check10 of 10 met

All structural checks are met.

  • Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording can produce opportunities data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Conflict Resolution.

  • Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.

What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.

About this template
Level guidance
For students who respond to conflicts with blame, insults, or silence and are ready to name what they want instead. Present levels and observation or role-play data, not grade, decide fit. Accept I-messages in any mode, including typed or AAC.
Baseline considerations
Record what the student says or does in 5 or more conflict situations (observed or role-played): I-message, blaming, insulting, physical response, withdrawing, or seeking an adult. Note which situations are hardest.
Usage notes
Score correct when the student's message names the situation and what they want, without insults or threats. Exact wording is not required. Tone and volume are not scored, since they vary across students and cultures.
Known limitations
The goal measures one step of conflict resolution; it does not ensure the conflict is resolved. Role-play data may overestimate real-world use; include real situations as soon as possible.
Source
Original IEP Atlas draft (AI-assisted) based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. Template ID se-cr-002.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.

Build objectives by

Matching data sheet

Opportunity tracker. Your goal counts opportunities, so the sheet has one box per opportunity in each session.

Opportunity tracker

Opportunities
Student label:
 
Target:
in at least 4 of 5 opportunities
Mastery rule:
across 3 consecutive weekly data collection sessions
Collection schedule:
weekly through role-play probes and observed conflicts
Method:
Opportunity (trial) recording
Data collector:
 

Goal: By the annual IEP review date, when a peer does something the student objects to (e.g., takes their materials, cuts in line, interrupts), the student will state the problem using an I-message that names the situation and what they want (e.g., "I don't like it when you take my pencil. Please ask first.") independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive weekly data collection sessions, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected weekly through role-play probes and observed conflicts.

Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred

Opportunity tracker
DateActivity / context12345# + (of 5)Notes

Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.

  • Record up to 5 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
  • Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
  • Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.

Preview
share_link