Skip to content
IEP Atlas
Menu

Repair a message when a listener doesn't follow it

Unreviewed draftK-2, 3-5, 6-8Opportunities
Student reference

Use a generic label rather than a student's name. Review goals within your school's approved IEP system.

Current baseline

Sample numbers are illustrative. Set the baseline and target from the student's own assessment data and team judgment.

Condition

Setting, materials, or situation, such as a passage level or a work period.

Observable behavior

Something an adult can see, count, or time. Avoid “understand,” “improve,” or “know.”

Level of support

Say exactly what support counts, such as “with one verbal prompt.” Leave “independently” if none.

Criterion

Number of opportunities in which the behavior is demonstrated, out of a fixed number.

Measurement method

Each planned or naturally occurring opportunity is recorded as correct/independent, prompted, or not demonstrated.

Mastery rule
Timeframe and monitoring

You can type a date, such as “By May 15, 2027”.

Match the schedule to the skill. Fluency often uses weekly probes. Writing rubrics may be scored every few weeks.

Live goal preview

By the annual IEP review date, when a communication partner signals they did not understand (e.g., "What?", "Show me," a confused look paired with a question), the student will repair the message by repeating, rephrasing, adding a gesture or sign, showing the item, or using their communication device independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection days, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

Baseline: 1 of 5 opportunities.

  • Condition
  • Observable behavior
  • Criterion
  • Measurement method
Add objectivesMatching data sheet

Measurability check10 of 10 met

All structural checks are met.

  • Met: Observable behavior. The behavior is stated as an action.

  • Met: Condition. The goal states when or under what conditions the behavior occurs.

  • Met: Unit fits the behavior. Opportunities is a reasonable way to quantify this behavior.

  • Met: Explicit criterion. The success criterion is stated with a number and unit.

  • Met: Mastery rule and schedule. Mastery rule and collection schedule are stated.

  • Met: Method produces the metric. Opportunity (trial) recording can produce opportunities data.

  • Met: Review timeframe. The goal includes a timeframe.

  • Met: Baseline and target compatible. Baseline and target use the same unit and show change in the intended direction.

  • Met: Aligned with area of need. The wording still relates to Functional Communication.

  • Met: Level of support. The level of support is defined.

What this checks: the goal's structure and wording, using fixed rules: observable behavior, condition, criterion, method, mastery rule, timeframe, baseline/target consistency, and support. It can't judge whether the goal is appropriate, ambitious enough, or legally sufficient for a particular student. That requires assessment data and the IEP team.

About this template
Level guidance
For students whose messages are sometimes not understood (because of speech intelligibility, AAC navigation, or unclear references) and who give up or become frustrated. Present levels and SLP assessment, not grade, decide fit.
Baseline considerations
Record natural breakdowns and a few planned ones (the partner says "I didn't get that") and note the student's response: repair, repeat with no change, give up, or show frustration. The SLP can add information on which repair strategies the student can already use.
Usage notes
An opportunity begins when the listener signals a breakdown. Score correct when the student makes at least one repair attempt within 10 seconds, in any mode. Planned breakdowns should be used sparingly and kindly; the listener should then respond to the repaired message. Develop with the SLP.
Known limitations
Natural breakdowns are unpredictable, so mix in a small number of planned ones. The goal measures the attempt, not whether the listener eventually understood. Listener patience and familiarity strongly affect outcomes.
Source
Original IEP Atlas draft (AI-assisted) based on general measurement principles; not copied from any goal bank. Template ID se-com-005.

Short-term objectives (optional)

When are objectives required?

Federal IDEA regulations require benchmarks or short-term objectives only for students who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards (34 CFR §300.320(a)(2)(ii)). Your state or district may require them more broadly.

Build objectives by

Matching data sheet

Opportunity tracker. Your goal counts opportunities, so the sheet has one box per opportunity in each session.

Opportunity tracker

Opportunities
Student label:
 
Target:
in at least 4 of 5 opportunities
Mastery rule:
across 3 consecutive data collection days
Collection schedule:
twice weekly
Method:
Opportunity (trial) recording
Data collector:
 

Goal: By the annual IEP review date, when a communication partner signals they did not understand (e.g., "What?", "Show me," a confused look paired with a question), the student will repair the message by repeating, rephrasing, adding a gesture or sign, showing the item, or using their communication device independently in at least 4 of 5 opportunities, across 3 consecutive data collection days, as measured by opportunity-by-opportunity data collected twice weekly.

Key: + demonstrated independently · P demonstrated with a prompt (note type) · − not demonstrated · NA no opportunity occurred

Opportunity tracker
DateActivity / context12345# + (of 5)Notes

Preview shows 4 of 12 rows.

  • Record up to 5 opportunities per session, matching the goal's denominator.
  • Define in advance what counts as an opportunity so every data collector records the same thing.
  • Count only + marks toward the criterion unless the goal specifies prompted responses.

The CSV opens in Excel or Google Sheets with formulas for the calculated columns. Sheets are blank: IEP Atlas doesn't store student data.

Preview
share_link