Skip to content

IEP goals for inferencing: 24 examples with evidence criteria

By the IEP Atlas editorial teamLast updated

Short answer

An inferencing IEP goal names the text, the kind of inference and a criterion that requires a clue from the text. Example: after reading an unpracticed grade 3 story, Kai will answer 5 inference questions by stating the answer and the clue that supports it, for 4 of 5 questions on 3 consecutive probes. Score the clue, not just the answer.

An inference is an idea the text does not state, built from a clue in the text plus what the reader already knows. A goal that says "will make inferences with 80% accuracy" leaves out the text, the kind of inference and what counts as correct. Most of all, it leaves out the clue. A student who guesses right with no clue has not inferred anything.

The 24 goals below are grouped by the kind of inference, from picture-supported read-alouds to test-style passages and social language. Each shows a condition, a baseline, a criterion with a denominator and a template link. Numbers are illustrations, not benchmarks. For comprehension goals across all skills, see IEP goals for reading comprehension. To teach the skill, use inference activities. The pillar, reading comprehension strategies, covers the full set of strategies.

How to choose an inferencing goal

Give a short probe first: one passage at the student's instructional level and 5 inference questions. Ask "How do you know?" after every answer. The pattern of answers tells you where to start.

What the student doesSub-skill to targetMeasurement method
Answers only "what" and "who" questions; "why" gets a shrugWhy and how questions with picturesPercent accuracy on 5 questions
Names a feeling but cannot say whyCharacter feelings and motivesQuestions with answer and reason
Gives a right answer with "I just know"Inference with text evidenceRubric: 1 point answer, 1 point clue
Answers from life, not the textText-based vs background-only answersRubric with clue required
Predicts wildly or never checksPredicting and revisingPredictions checked, out of planned stops
Takes idioms, sarcasm or hints literallySocial and nonliteral inferencesAccuracy on spoken or written scenarios

The What Works Clearinghouse guide for kindergarten through grade 3 lists drawing inferences among the comprehension strategies worth teaching explicitly.[1] For grades 4 to 9, the WWC intervention guide recommends building word and world knowledge and having students ask and answer questions about text.[2] Inference depends on both.

Picture and read-aloud inferences (preschool to grade 2)

  1. After a picture book read aloud, Nora will answer 5 why and how questions about the story using the pictures and words, with 4 of 5 correct across 3 consecutive sessions. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template.
  2. After hearing a 5-sentence story, Nora will answer 4 inference questions about a passage heard aloud, with 3 of 4 correct on 3 probes. Baseline: 1 of 4. Template.
  3. Given a picture of a character and the page text read aloud, Omar will tell how the character feels and point to the clue in the picture, for 4 of 5 pages across 3 books. Baseline: names a feeling on 2 of 5 pages, no clue. Template.
  4. During a read-aloud with 3 planned stops, Omar will predict what happens next and give one clue from the story, at 3 of 3 stops in 4 of 5 sessions. Baseline: 1 of 3 stops. Template.

Weak: "Nora will answer inference questions." Measurable: Goal 1 above. It names the text, the question type, the count and the sessions.

Character feelings and motives (grades 1 to 5)

  1. After reading an unpracticed grade 2 story, Kai will state how a character feels at 3 marked points and give the event that caused it, for 3 of 3 points in 4 of 5 stories. Baseline: 1 of 3. Template.
  2. After reading a short story, Kai will explain why a character made a key choice using a clue from the text, scoring 3 of 4 rubric points on 3 consecutive probes. Baseline: 1 of 4. Template.
  3. Given a grade 4 story, Lena will infer 2 traits of a character from how other characters react to them, citing one line for each, on 4 of 5 probes. Baseline: 0 of 2 traits with a line. Template.
  4. After reading a novel in class, Lena will describe how the main character changed from beginning to end with one quote from each part, scoring 6 of 8 rubric points on 2 of 3 assessments. Baseline: 3 of 8. Template.

Weak: "Kai will understand characters' feelings." Measurable: Goal 1 above. It names the stops, the clue and the stories.

Inference with text evidence (grades 3 to 8)

  1. After reading an unpracticed grade 4 passage, Kai will answer 5 inference questions by stating the answer and the clue that supports it, for 4 of 5 questions on 3 consecutive probes. Baseline: 1 of 5 with a clue. Template.
  2. Given 6 questions about a passage, Mia will sort each as "in the book" or "in my head" and answer it, with 5 of 6 sorted and answered correctly on 3 probes. Baseline: 2 of 6. Template.
  3. Given 8 questions about a passage, Mia will tell whether the answer is stated in one place, spread across sentences or must be inferred, with 7 of 8 correct across 3 probes. Baseline: 3 of 8. Template.
  4. Given a test-style grade 6 passage with 6 inference items, Andre will choose the answer and underline the supporting sentence for 5 of 6 items on 3 of 4 probes. Baseline: 2 of 6. Template.

Weak: "Mia will make inferences with 80% accuracy." Measurable: Goal 1 above. Score 1 point for the answer and 1 point for the clue, and count only answers with both.

Predicting and revising (grades 2 to 6)

  1. While reading a grade 3 story with 3 planned stops, Leo will write a prediction with a clue and then mark it confirmed or changed, at 3 of 3 stops in 4 of 5 stories. Baseline: predicts at 1 of 3 stops, never checks. Template.
  2. Before reading a textbook chapter, Leo will preview the headings and visuals and write 2 predictions about the content, with 2 of 2 linked to a text feature on 4 of 5 chapters. Baseline: 0 of 2. Template.
  3. During a guided reading lesson, Priya will revise a prediction when new information contradicts it and say what changed her mind, in 4 of 5 opportunities across 3 weeks. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template.
  4. Given a graphic novel page, Priya will answer 4 questions that require reading the pictures and the speech bubbles together, with 3 of 4 correct across 3 pages. Baseline: 1 of 4. Template.

Weak: "Leo will make predictions while reading." Measurable: Goal 1 above. It requires a clue and a check at a fixed number of stops.

Informational and higher-level inferences (grades 6 to 12)

  1. Given a grade 7 science article, Andre will answer 4 questions about causes or effects the article implies but does not state, giving the supporting sentence, for 3 of 4 on 3 probes. Baseline: 1 of 4. Template.
  2. Given a political cartoon and a short caption, Rosa will explain the cartoonist's message and 2 details that show it, scoring 3 of 4 rubric points on 3 probes. Baseline: 1 of 4. Template.
  3. Given a scene from a play, Rosa will explain what the audience knows that a character does not, and why it matters, scoring 3 of 4 rubric points on 2 of 3 probes. Baseline: 1 of 4. Template.
  4. Given a 600-word article, Andre will write what the author implies about the topic and quote 2 lines that support it, scoring 4 of 5 rubric points on 3 probes. Baseline: 2 of 5. Template.

Weak: "Andre will read between the lines." Measurable: Goal 2 above. It names the text, the response and the score.

Social and nonliteral inferences (speech-language)

  1. Given 10 short spoken social scenarios, Sam will explain what the speaker most likely means, with 8 of 10 correct on 3 consecutive sessions. Baseline: 4 of 10. Template.
  2. Given 8 recorded statements, Sam will tell whether the speaker is being sarcastic and name the cue (tone, context or words), with 7 of 8 correct on 3 sessions. Baseline: 3 of 8. Template.
  3. Given 10 written conversations with an indirect request, Jada will state what the speaker wants the listener to do, with 8 of 10 correct across 3 sessions. Baseline: 5 of 10. Template.
  4. After a short story read aloud, Jada will answer 5 questions about what characters think but do not say, with 4 of 5 correct and a clue for each, on 3 probes. Baseline: 1 of 5. Template.

Weak: "Sam will understand social cues." Measurable: Goal 1 above. Figurative language has its own goals in IEP goals for figurative language.

How to measure inferencing goals

  • Score the clue. Use a 2-point item: 1 point for a reasonable answer, 1 for a clue from the text. Count items at 2 points toward the criterion.
  • Check each question. If a student could answer it without the passage, it measures background knowledge. Replace it.
  • Keep passages steady. Unpracticed, one level, similar length. Change topics, not difficulty.
  • Record on one sheet. The rubric scoring data sheet works for 2-point items; the accuracy data sheet works for multiple choice.

Probe every 2 weeks and graph the scores; repeated measures over time show the trend.[3] More on probe design is in how to measure reading comprehension for an IEP.

Short-term objectives for inferencing goals

Step from heavy support to none. For the text evidence goal: by the first report, 4 of 5 with the clue sentence highlighted for the student; by the second, 4 of 5 with the paragraph named; by the third, 4 of 5 with no help locating the clue. Each annual goal needs a stated way of measuring and reporting progress.[4] The short-term objectives guide has the format.

Adapting by grade and support level

Grade band or needTypical focusExample change
Preschool to grade 1Why questions, feelings from picturesRead aloud, point to the picture clue
Grades 2 to 3Character feelings, predictionsShort stories with marked stops
Grades 4 to 5Answer plus clue, question typesUnpracticed passages, 2-point items
Middle schoolImplied causes, motives, test-style itemsUnderline the supporting sentence
High schoolAuthor's implied message, irony, cartoonsRubric with 2 quotes
Access needsChoice of 3 answers with picturesText read aloud, AAC response

The inferencing goal hub and the comprehension goals page list full templates. The inference glossary entry gives a family-friendly definition. Paste your draft into the goal checker before the meeting.

Frequently asked questions

What is a good inferencing IEP goal?

One that names the text and level, the kind of inference and a criterion that requires a clue. For example: after reading an unpracticed grade 4 passage, the student will answer 5 inference questions with the answer and the supporting clue, for 4 of 5 questions on 3 probes.

Should an inferencing goal be in reading or speech?

It depends on the barrier. If the student infers well from spoken stories but not from print, it belongs in reading. If the student struggles with inference in conversation and stories heard aloud, it often belongs with the SLP, and both may share a goal.

How do I score an inference answer?

Give 1 point for a reasonable answer and 1 point for a clue from the text. Count only answers with both toward the criterion. This separates real inference from guessing or answering from personal experience.

Use it in IEP Atlas

Sources

  1. Improving Reading Comprehension in Kindergarten Through 3rd Grade, What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences
  2. Providing Reading Interventions for Students in Grades 4–9, What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences
  3. Progress Monitoring: Data & Goal Setting, National Center on Intensive Intervention
  4. 34 CFR §300.320: Definition of individualized education program, Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School

Written and checked by the IEP Atlas editorial team under our editorial policy. This guide describes general practice and federal rules. It is not legal advice; your state may add requirements, and the IEP team makes the decisions for each student.

IEP Atlas Pro

Turn your goals into progress reports

Pro tracks every goal on your caseload and drafts the report for you. Free for 14 days.

Count trials, prompts, and minutes live in the session; the graph and trend line draw themselves; progress reports are drafted from your data.